Thomas A Dewland1, Jeffrey E Olgin, Eric Vittinghoff, Gregory M Marcus. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Section (T.A.D., J.E.O., G.M.M.) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (E.V.), University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and race has only been rigorously compared in population-based studies that dichotomized participants as white or black, it is unclear whether white race confers elevated AF risk or black race affords AF protection. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify patients receiving hospital-based care in California between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009. The association between race and incident AF was examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Interaction analyses were performed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the race-AF association. Among 13 967 949 patients, 375 318 incident AF episodes were observed over a median 3.2 (interquartile range 1.8-4.3) years. In multivariable Cox models adjusting for patient demographics and established AF risk factors, blacks (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.85; P<0.001), Hispanics (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.79; P<0.001), and Asians (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.79; P<0.001) each exhibited a lower AF risk compared with whites. AF risk among whites was disproportionately higher in the absence of acquired cardiovascular risk factors and diminished or reversed in the presence of comorbid diseases. Although Hispanics and Asians also had a lower adjusted risk of incident atrial flutter compared with whites, the risk of flutter was significantly higher among blacks. CONCLUSIONS: In a large hospital-based cohort, whites have an increased risk of AF whether compared with blacks, Asians, or Hispanics. The heightened AF risk among whites is most pronounced in the absence of cardiovascular comorbidities.
BACKGROUND: Because the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and race has only been rigorously compared in population-based studies that dichotomized participants as white or black, it is unclear whether white race confers elevated AF risk or black race affords AF protection. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project was used to identify patients receiving hospital-based care in California between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2009. The association between race and incident AF was examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Interaction analyses were performed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the race-AF association. Among 13 967 949 patients, 375 318 incident AF episodes were observed over a median 3.2 (interquartile range 1.8-4.3) years. In multivariable Cox models adjusting for patient demographics and established AF risk factors, blacks (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.85; P<0.001), Hispanics (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.79; P<0.001), and Asians (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.79; P<0.001) each exhibited a lower AF risk compared with whites. AF risk among whites was disproportionately higher in the absence of acquired cardiovascular risk factors and diminished or reversed in the presence of comorbid diseases. Although Hispanics and Asians also had a lower adjusted risk of incident atrial flutter compared with whites, the risk of flutter was significantly higher among blacks. CONCLUSIONS: In a large hospital-based cohort, whites have an increased risk of AF whether compared with blacks, Asians, or Hispanics. The heightened AF risk among whites is most pronounced in the absence of cardiovascular comorbidities.
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Hooman Kamel; Suzanne E Judd; Monika M Safford; Viola Vaccarino; Virginia J Howard; George Howard; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric Shulman; Faraj Kargoli; Philip Aagaard; Ethan Hoch; Luigi Di Biase; John Fisher; Jay Gross; Soo Kim; Kevin J Ferrick; Andrew Krumerman Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Wesley T O'Neal; Suzanne E Judd; Nita A Limdi; William F McIntyre; Dawn O Kleindorfer; Mary Cushman; Virginia J Howard; George Howard; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2016-08-16
Authors: Carlos J Rodriguez; Elsayed Z Soliman; Alvaro Alonso; Katrina Swett; Peter M Okin; David C Goff; Susan R Heckbert Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Utibe R Essien; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Larry R Jackson; Gregg C Fonarow; Kenneth W Mahaffey; James A Reiffel; Benjamin A Steinberg; Larry A Allen; Paul S Chan; James V Freeman; Rosalia G Blanco; Karen S Pieper; Jonathan P Piccini; Eric D Peterson; Daniel E Singer Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Matthew A Christensen; Kaylin T Nguyen; Phyllis K Stein; Raymond B Fohtung; Elsayed Z Soliman; Thomas A Dewland; Eric Vittinghoff; Bruce M Psaty; Susan R Heckbert; Gregory M Marcus Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 6.343