| Literature DB >> 24103365 |
Guanghao Shen1, Xiaoming Wu, Chi Tang, Yili Yan, Juan Liu, Wei Guo, Da Jing, Tao Lei, Yue Tian, Kangning Xie, Erping Luo, Jianbao Zhang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: When ascending to the high altitude, people living in low altitude areas will suffer from acute mountain sickness. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that whether an oxygen concentration membrane can be made and used to construct a new portable oxygen enrichment device for individuals in acute exposure to the high altitude.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24103365 PMCID: PMC4124732 DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Figure 1An oxygen enrichment membrane unit testing system. The system contains 1) membrane unit; 2) vacuum controller; 3) flow meter; 4) oxygen analyzer. The Green rectangular framework supports the whole structure. The blue part is a piece of membrane (another invisible piece is on the opposite side), which is torn apart to show the supporting nylon layers (red). The red part is the multiple nylon layers which lie in the middle and support the membrane. Two outlets (top) can be used to suck air by a vacuum pump (not shown).
Figure 2Production of oxygen enrichment device. 1) machine body; 2) bag; 3) disposable medical oxygen mask; 4) battery; 5) switch; 6) joint of oxygen enriched air outlet.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the oxygen enrichment device.
Figure 4Concentration of oxygen and flow rate of oxygen enriched air as functions of the pressure ratio across the oxygen enrichment membrane at altitude of 400 m at temperature 25°C.
Figure 5Concentration of oxygen and flow rate of oxygen enriched air as functions of temperature at altitude of 400 m with pressure difference of 70 kPa.
Figure 6Simulation in hypobaric chamber. The concentration of oxygen and flow rate drop as altitude is increasing. The pressure difference between the input and output of the device was set to 90 kPa.
Changes in HR, SpO, and PWC-170 at 3,700 m (Mean ± SD, n = 8)
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Without device | 83.00 ± 2.07 | 87.50 ± 1.51 | 201.26 ± 6.46 |
| With device | 75.00 ± 2.73* | 95.75 ± 1.04* | 230.43 ± 6.81* |
Note: *P<0.01. 'Without device’ vs. 'With device’. PWC-170 is the predicted power at HR = 170 beat/min, calculated from linear regression, see Materials and methods for detail.