Literature DB >> 24102777

Change of childbirth preference after delivery among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners.

Wen-Ying Li1, Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Babill Stray-Pedersen.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of childbirth preference among nulliparous Chinese women and their partners on actual mode of delivery, and to assess women's change in preference from vaginal delivery to cesarean and the factors associated with this change.
METHODS: A cohort study was conducted from July to October 2011 in the First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing. Nulliparous women at the gestational age of 36-40 weeks and their partners were included. Their childbirth preference was recorded twice: once in pregnancy and again 2 or 3 days post-partum.
RESULTS: Women preferring cesarean during pregnancy had a 3.9-fold higher chance of undergoing a cesarean than those preferring vaginal delivery (P = 0.004), while the partner's preference had no effect (P = 0.35). Preference for cesarean in the post-partum period increased significantly compared to that during pregnancy both among women, whose preference increased from 10.1% to 28.0%, and among their partners, whose preference increased from 7.8% to 16.7% (P < 0.001 for both). The rate of change in women's preference from vaginal delivery to cesarean was 26.0%. Women having high couple's monthly income, who were feeling depressed, whose partner preferred cesarean during pregnancy or who delivered by cesarean were more likely to experience this change due to fear of labor pain and perineal cutting and a greater perceived safety of cesarean.
CONCLUSION: Women's cesarean preference during pregnancy was associated with actual cesarean delivery. Inadequate quality of care in labor and delivery and overestimation of cesarean safety underlie post-partum women's increased preference for cesarean.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2013 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childbirth preference; couple; maternal request; partner; primipara

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102777     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of preference for caesarean delivery among pregnant women in Beijing.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhang; Jing Wu; Jessie Norris; Li Guo; Yifei Hu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Prevalence of and reasons for women's, family members', and health professionals' preferences for cesarean section in China: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Qian Long; Carol Kingdon; Fan Yang; Michael Dominic Renecle; Shayesteh Jahanfar; Meghan A Bohren; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Clémence Schantz; Myriam de Loenzien; Sophie Goyet; Marion Ravit; Aurélien Dancoisne; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of Migration on Infant and Maternal Health in China.

Authors:  Di Tang; Xiangdong Gao; Mayvis Rebeira; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  The Inconsistency Between Women's Preference and Actual Mode of Delivery in China: Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Li Feng; Hongwei Zhang; Li Guo; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Yifei Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  Women's cesarean section preferences and influencing factors in relation to China's two-child policy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Huijuan Liang; Yancun Fan; Nan Zhang; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Qingchun Wang; Jing Gong; Hutcha Sriplung
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.