Literature DB >> 24102513

Variations of pupil centration and their effects on video eye tracking.

Ulrich Wildenmann1, Frank Schaeffel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate measurement errors that are introduced in video eye tracking when pupil centration changes with pupil size.
METHODS: Software was developed under Visual C++ to track both pupil centre and corneal centre at 87 Hz sampling rate at baseline pupil sizes of 4.75 mm (800 lux room illuminance) and while pupil constrictions were elicited by a flashlight. Corneal centres were determined by a circle fit through the pixels detected at the corneal margin by an edge detection algorithm. Standard deviations for repeated measurements were ± 0.04 mm for horizontal pupil centre position and ± 0.04 mm for horizontal corneal centre positions and ±0.03 mm for vertical pupil centre position and ± 0.05 mm for vertical corneal centre position. Ten subjects were tested (five female, five male, age 25-58 years).
RESULTS: At 4 mm pupil sizes, the pupils were nasally decentred relative to the corneal centre by 0.18 ± 0.19 mm in the right eyes and -0.14 ± 0.22 mm in the left eyes. Vertical decentrations were 0.30 ± 0.30 mm and 0.27 ± 0.29 mm, respectively, always in a superior direction. At baseline pupil sizes (the natural pupil sizes at 800 lux) of 4.75 ± 0.52 mm, the decentrations became less (right and left eyes: horizontal 0.17 ± 0.20 mm and -0.12 ± 0.22 mm, and vertical 0.26 ± 0.28 mm and 0.20 ± 0.25 mm). While pupil decentration changed minimally in eight of the subjects, it shifted considerably in two others. Averaged over all subjects, the shift of the pupil centre position per millimetre pupil constriction was not significant (right and left eyes: -0.03 ± 0.07 mm and 0.03 ± 0.04 mm nasally per mm pupil size change, respectively, and -0.04 ± 0.06 mm and -0.05 ± 0.12 mm superiorly). Direction and magnitude of the changes in pupil centration could not be predicted from the initial decentration at baseline pupil sizes.
CONCLUSIONS: In line with data in the literature, the pupil centre was significantly decentred relative to the corneal centre in the nasal and superior direction. Pupil decentration changed significantly with pupil size by 0.05 mm on average for 1 mm of constriction. Assuming a Hirschberg ratio of 12° mm(-1) , a shift of 0.05 mm is equivalent to a measurement error in a Purkinje image-based eye tracker of 0.6°. However, the induced measurement error could also exceed 1.5° in some subjects for only a 1 mm change in pupil size.
© 2013 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2013 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  centration; eyetracker; iris; pupil

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102513     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  8 in total

Review 1.  A compact field guide to the study of microsaccades: Challenges and functions.

Authors:  Martina Poletti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06

3.  Eye movements between saccades: Measuring ocular drift and tremor.

Authors:  Hee-Kyoung Ko; D Max Snodderly; Martina Poletti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Monocular microsaccades: Do they really occur?

Authors:  Yu Fang; Christopher Gill; Martina Poletti; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Saccades to Explicit and Virtual Features in the Poggendorff Figure Show Perceptual Biases.

Authors:  Barbara Dillenburger; Michael Morgan
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-04-21

6.  Translation model for CW chord to angle Alpha derived from a Monte-Carlo simulation based on raytracing.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nóra Szentmáry; Alan Cayless; Johannes Weisensee; Jascha Wendelstein; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rapid stimulus-driven modulation of slow ocular position drifts.

Authors:  Tatiana Malevich; Antimo Buonocore; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  The pupil-size artefact (PSA) across time, viewing direction, and different eye trackers.

Authors:  Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Roy S Hessels; Dixon Cleveland; Marcus Nyström
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-03-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.