Literature DB >> 24102351

Indirect effects drive evolutionary responses to global change.

Jennifer A Lau1,2, Ruth G Shaw3, Peter B Reich4,5, Peter Tiffin1.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic environmental changes pose significant threats to plant and animal populations. These changes also may affect the evolution of natural populations either directly or indirectly by altering the outcome of species interactions that are important drivers of evolution. This latter indirect pathway may be especially important for evolutionary responses to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (eCO2), which appear to have minimal direct effects on plant evolution but have large effects on interspecific interactions, such as competition. We manipulated competitive and CO2 environments of experimental Arabidopsis thaliana populations to test whether eCO2 alters evolutionary trajectories indirectly by altering selection imposed by competitors. We found that interspecific competition increased selection on growth traits, reduced heritabilities, and altered genetic covariances between traits and that the magnitude of these effects depended upon the CO2 environment. Although eCO2 had minimal direct effects on evolutionary processes, eCO2 typically reduced the strength of selection imposed by competitors and, therefore, relaxed selection on plant traits when competitors were present. Our results indicate that global changes may affect plant evolution indirectly by altering competitive interactions and underscore the importance of conducting research in natural communities when attempting to predict population responses to global change.
© 2013 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2013 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G matrix; carbon dioxide (CO2); competition; direct and indirect effects; genetic variation; natural selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102351     DOI: 10.1111/nph.12490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  9 in total

1.  Plastic responses to novel environments are biased towards phenotype dimensions with high additive genetic variation.

Authors:  Daniel W A Noble; Reinder Radersma; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence that divergent selection shapes a developmental cline in a forest tree species complex.

Authors:  João Costa E Silva; Peter A Harrison; Robert Wiltshire; Brad M Potts
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Examining Plant Physiological Responses to Climate Change through an Evolutionary Lens.

Authors:  Katie M Becklin; Jill T Anderson; Laci M Gerhart; Susana M Wadgymar; Carolyn A Wessinger; Joy K Ward
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Research highlights for issue 4: Predicting the evolutionary response of populations to climate change.

Authors:  Britt Koskella
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Contemporary evolution of an invasive grass in response to elevated atmospheric CO(2) at a Mojave Desert FACE site.

Authors:  Judah D Grossman; Kevin J Rice
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  A replicated climate change field experiment reveals rapid evolutionary response in an ecologically important soil invertebrate.

Authors:  Thomas Bataillon; Nicolas Galtier; Aurelien Bernard; Nicolai Cryer; Nicolas Faivre; Sylvain Santoni; Dany Severac; Teis N Mikkelsen; Klaus S Larsen; Claus Beier; Jesper G Sørensen; Martin Holmstrup; Bodil K Ehlers
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-04-24       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Host-Associated Rhizobial Fitness: Dependence on Nitrogen, Density, Community Complexity, and Legume Genotype.

Authors:  Liana T Burghardt; Brendan Epstein; Michelle Hoge; Diana I Trujillo; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.005

8.  Adaptation to elevated CO2 in different biodiversity contexts.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto; Peter B Reich; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Competition alters species' plastic and genetic response to environmental change.

Authors:  Lynn Govaert; Luis J Gilarranz; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.