Literature DB >> 24101485

Delayed detection of climate mitigation benefits due to climate inertia and variability.

Claudia Tebaldi1, Pierre Friedlingstein.   

Abstract

Climate change mitigation acts by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and thus curbing, or even reversing, the increase in their atmospheric concentration. This reduces the associated anthropogenic radiative forcing, and hence the size of the warming. Because of the inertia and internal variability affecting the climate system and the global carbon cycle, it is unlikely that a reduction in warming would be immediately discernible. Here we use 21st century simulations from the latest ensemble of Earth System Model experiments to investigate and quantify when mitigation becomes clearly discernible. We use one of the scenarios as a reference for a strong mitigation strategy, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 2.6 and compare its outcome with either RCP4.5 or RCP8.5, both of which are less severe mitigation pathways. We analyze global mean atmospheric CO2, and changes in annually and seasonally averaged surface temperature at global and regional scales. For global mean surface temperature, the median detection time of mitigation is about 25-30 y after RCP2.6 emissions depart from the higher emission trajectories. This translates into detection of a mitigation signal by 2035 or 2045, depending on whether the comparison is with RCP8.5 or RCP4.5, respectively. The detection of climate benefits of emission mitigation occurs later at regional scales, with a median detection time between 30 and 45 y after emission paths separate. Requiring a 95% confidence level induces a delay of several decades, bringing detection time toward the end of the 21st century.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate variability; regional climate change; signal detection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24101485      PMCID: PMC3808634          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300005110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  2 in total

1.  The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections.

Authors:  Claudia Tebaldi; Reto Knutti
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment.

Authors:  Richard H Moss; Jae A Edmonds; Kathy A Hibbard; Martin R Manning; Steven K Rose; Detlef P van Vuuren; Timothy R Carter; Seita Emori; Mikiko Kainuma; Tom Kram; Gerald A Meehl; John F B Mitchell; Nebojsa Nakicenovic; Keywan Riahi; Steven J Smith; Ronald J Stouffer; Allison M Thomson; John P Weyant; Thomas J Wilbanks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Reply to: Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits.

Authors:  Bjørn H Samset; Jan S Fuglestvedt; Marianne T Lund
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Uncertainty in near-term temperature evolution must not obscure assessments of climate mitigation benefits.

Authors:  Alexandrine Lanson; Peter Pfleiderer; Flavio Lehner; Carl-Friedrich Schleussner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Defogging Climate Change Communication: How Cognitive Research Can Promote Effective Climate Communication.

Authors:  Dorothee Amelung; Helen Fischer; Lenelis Kruse; Rainer Sauerborn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-31

4.  Investigating Climate Compatible Development Outcomes and their Implications for Distributive Justice: Evidence from Malawi.

Authors:  Benjamin T Wood; Claire H Quinn; Lindsay C Stringer; Andrew J Dougill
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Wildfire response to changing daily temperature extremes in California's Sierra Nevada.

Authors:  Aurora A Gutierrez; Stijn Hantson; Baird Langenbrunner; Bin Chen; Yufang Jin; Michael L Goulden; James T Randerson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  A weakened AMOC may prolong greenhouse gas-induced Mediterranean drying even with significant and rapid climate change mitigation.

Authors:  Thomas L Delworth; William F Cooke; Vaishali Naik; David Paynter; Liping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation.

Authors:  B H Samset; J S Fuglestvedt; M T Lund
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Earlier emergence of a temperature response to mitigation by filtering annual variability.

Authors:  B H Samset; C Zhou; J S Fuglestvedt; M T Lund; J Marotzke; M D Zelinka
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.