Literature DB >> 24101456

Mammalian cells preferentially internalize hydrogel nanodiscs over nanorods and use shape-specific uptake mechanisms.

Rachit Agarwal1, Vikramjit Singh, Patrick Jurney, Li Shi, S V Sreenivasan, Krishnendu Roy.   

Abstract

Size, surface charge, and material compositions are known to influence cell uptake of nanoparticles. However, the effect of particle geometry, i.e., the interplay between nanoscale shape and size, is less understood. Here we show that when shape is decoupled from volume, charge, and material composition, under typical in vitro conditions, mammalian epithelial and immune cells preferentially internalize disc-shaped, negatively charged hydrophilic nanoparticles of high aspect ratios compared with nanorods and lower aspect-ratio nanodiscs. Endothelial cells also prefer nanodiscs, however those of intermediate aspect ratio. Interestingly, unlike nanospheres, larger-sized hydrogel nanodiscs and nanorods are internalized more efficiently than their smallest counterparts. Kinetics, efficiency, and mechanisms of uptake are all shape-dependent and cell type-specific. Although macropinocytosis is used by both epithelial and endothelial cells, epithelial cells uniquely internalize these nanoparticles using the caveolae-mediated pathway. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, on the other hand, use clathrin-mediated uptake for all shapes and show significantly higher uptake efficiency compared with epithelial cells. Using results from both upright and inverted cultures, we propose that nanoparticle internalization is a complex manifestation of three shape- and size-dependent parameters: particle surface-to-cell membrane contact area, i.e., particle-cell adhesion, strain energy for membrane deformation, and sedimentation or local particle concentration at the cell membrane. These studies provide a fundamental understanding on how nanoparticle uptake in different mammalian cells is influenced by the nanoscale geometry and is critical for designing improved nanocarriers and predicting nanomaterial toxicity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-uptake mechanism; drug delivery; nanoimprint lithography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24101456      PMCID: PMC3808581          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305000110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

Review 1.  Protein transport across the lung epithelial barrier.

Authors:  Kwang-Jin Kim; Asrar B Malik
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 2.  Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Robby A Petros; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells.

Authors:  B Devika Chithrani; Arezou A Ghazani; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 4.  Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Lutz Mädler; Ning Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments.

Authors:  Justin G Teeguarden; Paul M Hinderliter; Galya Orr; Brian D Thrall; Joel G Pounds
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Nanoimprint lithography based fabrication of shape-specific, enzymatically-triggered smart nanoparticles.

Authors:  Luz Cristal Glangchai; Mary Caldorera-Moore; Li Shi; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Role of target geometry in phagocytosis.

Authors:  Julie A Champion; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns.

Authors:  Paul W K Rothemund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Surface charge of nanoparticles determines their endocytic and transcytotic pathway in polarized MDCK cells.

Authors:  Oshrat Harush-Frenkel; Eva Rozentur; Simon Benita; Yoram Altschuler
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials.

Authors:  Jason P Rolland; Benjamin W Maynor; Larken E Euliss; Ansley E Exner; Ginger M Denison; Joseph M DeSimone
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Hydrogels and scaffolds for immunomodulation.

Authors:  Ankur Singh; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 2.  Nanoscale strategies: treatment for peripheral vascular disease and critical limb ischemia.

Authors:  Chengyi Tu; Subhamoy Das; Aaron B Baker; Janeta Zoldan; Laura J Suggs
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Anti-CD20 single chain variable antibody fragment-apolipoprotein A-I chimera containing nanodisks promote targeted bioactive agent delivery to CD20-positive lymphomas.

Authors:  Natasha M Crosby; Mistuni Ghosh; Betty Su; Jennifer A Beckstead; Ayako Kamei; Jens B Simonsen; Bing Luo; Leo I Gordon; Trudy M Forte; Robert O Ryan
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.626

Review 4.  Challenges of gene delivery to the central nervous system and the growing use of biomaterial vectors.

Authors:  Devan L Puhl; Anthony R D'Amato; Ryan J Gilbert
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Influences of nanocarrier morphology on therapeutic immunomodulation.

Authors:  Molly Frey; Sharan Bobbala; Nicholas Karabin; Evan Scott
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.307

6.  Nanoparticle Design Strategies for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Praveena Velpurisiva; Aniket Gad; Brandon Piel; Rahul Jadia; Prakash Rai
Journal:  J Biomed (Syd)       Date:  2017

Review 7.  Engineering immunity: Modulating dendritic cell subsets and lymph node response to direct immune-polarization and vaccine efficacy.

Authors:  Jardin Leleux; Alexandra Atalis; Krishnendu Roy
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  Nanocarriers for spleen targeting: anatomo-physiological considerations, formulation strategies and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Anil B Jindal
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.617

9.  Pair correlation microscopy reveals the role of nanoparticle shape in intracellular transport and site of drug release.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hinde; Kitiphume Thammasiraphop; Hien T T Duong; Jonathan Yeow; Bunyamin Karagoz; Cyrille Boyer; J Justin Gooding; Katharina Gaus
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Simulation and Experimental Assembly of DNA-Graft Copolymer Micelles with Controlled Morphology.

Authors:  Zonghui We; Yong Ren; John-Michael Williford; Wei Qu; Kevin Huang; Shirley Ng; Hai-Quan Mao; Erik Luijten
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2015-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.