Literature DB >> 24100590

Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery for cervical carcinoma international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB2-IIB.

Lucas Minig1, Nicoletta Colombo, Vanna Zanagnolo, Fabio Landoni, Luca Bocciolone, José Miguel Cárdenas-Rebollo, Simona Iodice, Angelo Maggioni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the response rate to chemotherapy, as well as the progression-free survival (PFS), the overall survival (OS), and the main prognostic factors in patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan, Italy.
METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on patients with uterine cervical carcinoma, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2 to IIB, who underwent platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical hysterectomy.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were studied. The median (range) age was 45 years old (23-69 years). The distribution of patients by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was as follows: n = 88 (73%) with stage IB2, n = 7 (6%) with stage IIA, and n = 26 (21%) with stage IIB. The median (range) tumor size was 50 mm (20-90 mm). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy involved a combination of cisplatin, paclitaxel, and ifosfamide in 80 patients (65%). Using this treatment, 112 patients (93%) received 3 cycles of NACT, whereas 6 (5%) received 4 cycles. Complete and partial pathology response was observed in 9 patients (7%) and 79 patients (66%), respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not necessary in 65% of patients. A 5-year PFS and OS of 58% and 71%, respectively, were observed. Independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS were identified, including response to NACT, persistent lymph node metastases, and parametrial involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this group of tumors is a promising treatment strategy and should be discussed with patients. Although these results are comparable to those obtained by standard chemoradiation treatment, one strategy should not be recommended over the other until the results of the ongoing phase 3 trial for NACT are released.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24100590     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a616d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  9 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery as an alternative treatment to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for young premenopausal patients with FIGO stage IIB squamous cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  ShanShan Yang; Ying Gao; Jing Sun; Bairong Xia; TianBo Liu; HongXia Zhang; Qi Li; Min Xiao; YunYan Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-21

Review 2.  Different strategies of treatment for uterine cervical carcinoma stage IB2-IIB.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; María Guadalupe Patrono; Nuria Romero; Juan Francisco Rodríguez Moreno; Jesús Garcia-Donas
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10

3.  Efficacy and tolerability of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppa Scandurra; Giuseppe Scibilia; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Gabriella D'Agate; Helga Lipari; Stefania Gieri; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.401

4.  Pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase is an independent prognostic factor for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Miao-Fang Wu; Huai-Wu Lu; Qing Chen; Zhong-Qiu Lin; Li-Juan Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has no therapeutic advantages over concurrent chemoradiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB-IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeongshim Lee; Tae Hyung Kim; Gwi Eon Kim; Ki Chang Keum; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Optimal pathological response indicated better long-term outcome among patients with stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kecheng Huang; Haiying Sun; Zhilan Chen; Xiong Li; ShaoShuai Wang; Xiaolin Zhao; Fangxu Tang; Yao Jia; Ting Hu; Xiaofang Du; Haoran Wang; Zhiyong Lu; Jia Huang; Juan Gui; Xiaoli Wang; Shasha Zhou; Lin Wang; Jincheng Zhang; Lili Guo; Ru Yang; Jian Shen; Qinghua Zhang; Shuang Li; Shixuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cost-effectiveness of radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yanlan Chai; Juan Wang; Tao Wang; Fan Shi; Jiquan Wang; Jin Su; Yunyi Yang; Xi Zhou; Hailin Ma; Bin He; Zi Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Treatments Compared to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yunfeng Qiao; Huijun Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Yanlan Chai; Tao Wang; Juan Wang; Yunyi Yang; Ying Gao; Jiyong Gao; Shangfeng Gao; Yueling Wang; Xi Zhou; Zi Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.