Jimeng Hu1, Yeming Wu, Jun Wang, Chi Zhang, Weihua Pan, Ying Zhou. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated To Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No 1665, Kongjiang Road, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China, jimeng1214@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diaphragmatic plication by minimally invasive surgery is thought to allow for a quick recovery and has been performed on small children. Here, we report our experience with different plication procedures to discuss how to choose among these different plication procedures in endoscopic surgery for pediatric patients with diaphragmatic eventration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 27 pediatric patients (21 boys, 6 girls; median age: 12.7 months, range 2 months-3 years) admitted to our hospital between November 2008 and July 2013. Three different plication procedures were used: the "reefing the mainsail" technique (8 patients), "invaginating the diaphragmatic dome" technique (10 patients), and "pleating" technique (9 patients). Indications included ventilator dependency (7.41 %), respiratory distress (22.22 %), chronic lung lobe collapse (11.11 %), persistent atelectasis with recurrent pneumonias (18.52 %), and asymptomatic severe eventration (40.74 %). RESULTS: Descending distance of diaphragm after surgery ranged from 1 to 4.5 intercostal spaces (mean distance: 2.65 intercostal spaces). All patients recovered well postoperatively, except for one patient with a pneumothorax. Two patients who required respiratory support before the operation no longer required it within 7 d after surgery. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 35 months. Clinical results were satisfactory with obvious improvement in symptoms and a slight re-elevation within a distance of one intercostal space. CONCLUSION: For pediatric patients with diaphragmatic eventration, different endoscopic surgeries and plication procedures all yielded satisfactory results. We believe that the choice of one procedure over the other depends only on the surgeon's experience.
PURPOSE: Diaphragmatic plication by minimally invasive surgery is thought to allow for a quick recovery and has been performed on small children. Here, we report our experience with different plication procedures to discuss how to choose among these different plication procedures in endoscopic surgery for pediatric patients with diaphragmatic eventration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 27 pediatric patients (21 boys, 6 girls; median age: 12.7 months, range 2 months-3 years) admitted to our hospital between November 2008 and July 2013. Three different plication procedures were used: the "reefing the mainsail" technique (8 patients), "invaginating the diaphragmatic dome" technique (10 patients), and "pleating" technique (9 patients). Indications included ventilator dependency (7.41 %), respiratory distress (22.22 %), chronic lung lobe collapse (11.11 %), persistent atelectasis with recurrent pneumonias (18.52 %), and asymptomatic severe eventration (40.74 %). RESULTS: Descending distance of diaphragm after surgery ranged from 1 to 4.5 intercostal spaces (mean distance: 2.65 intercostal spaces). All patients recovered well postoperatively, except for one patient with a pneumothorax. Two patients who required respiratory support before the operation no longer required it within 7 d after surgery. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 35 months. Clinical results were satisfactory with obvious improvement in symptoms and a slight re-elevation within a distance of one intercostal space. CONCLUSION: For pediatric patients with diaphragmatic eventration, different endoscopic surgeries and plication procedures all yielded satisfactory results. We believe that the choice of one procedure over the other depends only on the surgeon's experience.
Authors: Mark Bishay; Luca Giacomello; Giuseppe Retrosi; Mandela Thyoka; Shireen A Nah; Merrill McHoney; Paolo De Coppi; Joe Brierley; Stephen Scuplak; Edward M Kiely; Joe I Curry; David P Drake; Kate M K Cross; Simon Eaton; Agostino Pierro Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Merrill McHoney; Lucia Corizia; Simon Eaton; Edward M Kiely; David P Drake; Hock L Tan; Lewis Spitz; Agostino Pierro Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Shawn S Groth; Natasha M Rueth; Teri Kast; Jonathan D'Cunha; Rosemary F Kelly; Michael A Maddaus; Rafael S Andrade Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Christopher W Snyder; N Elizabeth Walford; Paul D Danielson; Nicole M Chandler Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Diksha Bains; Aksh Chahal; Mohammad Abu Shaphe; Faizan Z Kashoo; Taimul Ali; Ahmad H Alghadir; Masood Khan Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Kim Heiwegen; Arno Fj van Heijst; Horst Daniels-Scharbatke; Michelle Cp van Peperstraten; Ivo de Blaauw; Sanne Mbi Botden Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 3.183