BACKGROUND: Differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from other causes of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy remains a clinical challenge, especially in patients with preserved ejection fraction at the early disease stages. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive hypertrophic patients with CA, isolated arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, and Friedreich ataxia (n=25 per group) were investigated; 25 healthy volunteers served as a control group. Standard echocardiography was performed, and segmental longitudinal peak systolic strain (LSsys) in the septum was assessed by 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. Indices of left ventricular hypertrophy and ejection fraction were similar among all patient groups. Deceleration time of early filling was significantly lower in patients with CA (147±46 milliseconds) compared with those with isolated arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, or control subjects (all P<0.0125). Septal basal LSsys (-6±2%) was significantly lower in patients with CA compared with those with isolated arterial hypertension (-14±6%), Fabry disease (-12±5%), Friedreich ataxia (-16±2%), or control subjects (-17±3%; all P<0.001), whereas septal apical LSsys was similar among all patient groups and control subjects (all P>0.05). A data-driven cutoff value for the ratio of septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1 differentiated CA from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 85%; positive predictive value, 67%; negative predictive value, 96%). The prevalence of septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1 plus deceleration time of early filling <200 milliseconds was 88% in CA but 0% in all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: A systolic septal longitudinal base-to-apex strain gradient (septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1), combined with a shortened diastolic deceleration time of early filling (deceleration time of early filling <200 milliseconds), aids in differentiating CA from other causes of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
BACKGROUND: Differentiation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) from other causes of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy remains a clinical challenge, especially in patients with preserved ejection fraction at the early disease stages. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive hypertrophicpatients with CA, isolated arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, and Friedreich ataxia (n=25 per group) were investigated; 25 healthy volunteers served as a control group. Standard echocardiography was performed, and segmental longitudinal peak systolic strain (LSsys) in the septum was assessed by 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. Indices of left ventricular hypertrophy and ejection fraction were similar among all patient groups. Deceleration time of early filling was significantly lower in patients with CA (147±46 milliseconds) compared with those with isolated arterial hypertension, Fabry disease, or control subjects (all P<0.0125). Septal basal LSsys (-6±2%) was significantly lower in patients with CA compared with those with isolated arterial hypertension (-14±6%), Fabry disease (-12±5%), Friedreich ataxia (-16±2%), or control subjects (-17±3%; all P<0.001), whereas septal apical LSsys was similar among all patient groups and control subjects (all P>0.05). A data-driven cutoff value for the ratio of septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1 differentiated CA from other causes of left ventricular hypertrophy (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 85%; positive predictive value, 67%; negative predictive value, 96%). The prevalence of septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1 plus deceleration time of early filling <200 milliseconds was 88% in CA but 0% in all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: A systolic septal longitudinal base-to-apex strain gradient (septal apical to basal LSsys ratio >2.1), combined with a shortened diastolic deceleration time of early filling (deceleration time of early filling <200 milliseconds), aids in differentiating CA from other causes of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy.
Entities:
Keywords:
amyloidosis; differential diagnosis; echocardiography; hypertrophy, left ventricular
Authors: Kai Hu; Dan Liu; Peter Nordbeck; Maja Cikes; Stefan Störk; Bastian Kramer; Philipp Daniel Gaudron; Andreas Schneider; Stefan Knop; Georg Ertl; Bart Bijnens; Frank Weidemann; Sebastian Herrmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Mirela Tuzovic; Eric H Yang; Arnold S Baas; Eugene C Depasquale; Mario C Deng; Daniel Cruz; Gabriel Vorobiof Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 5.075