Literature DB >> 24099684

Comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis without neural axis abnormalities.

Zhijun Chen1, Yong Qiu2, Weiwei Ma1, Bangping Qian1, Zezhang Zhu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) have been documented in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with different cure severity. However, few studies investigated whether abnormal SEPs were the cause or effect of idiopathic scoliosis.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the significance of abnormal SEPs in patients with AIS, and to explore its effect on the etiopathogenesis of AIS. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This study evaluated SEPs in patients with AIS and congenital scoliosis (CS) with similar curve pattern and severity both in coronal and sagittal planes. PATIENT SAMPLE: Female patients with AIS and CS in our spine surgery center from 2000 to 2009 were recruited for this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Rate of abnormal SEPs.
METHODS: Posterior tibial nerve SEPs (PTN-SEPs) were performed on female patients with AIS and CS. The inclusion criteria were patients with AIS with a Lenke type 1 curve and patients with CS with right thoracic curve (apex between T5 and T12) and normal sagittal profile (kyphosis less than 50° measured from T2 to T12). All patients were evaluated with total spine magnetic resonance imaging, and those with neural axis abnormalities were excluded. The patients with neurological deficits on detailed physical examination were also excluded. Absence of SEPs waveforms or prolongation of peak latency or asymmetrical peak latency were defined as pathological change. The incidence of pathological SEPs and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with AIS and patients with CS.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients with AIS and 33 patients with CS were included in this study. There was no significant difference in coronal and sagittal Cobb angle between the two groups. The rate of abnormal SEPs was 32.6% (15/46) and 12.1% (4/33) in AIS and CS groups, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p<.05).
CONCLUSION: Somatosensory pathway dysfunction could be found in both AIS and CS without neural axis abnormalities, and the patients with AIS tended to have higher rates of somatosensory disorders than patients with CS with similar scoliosis curve, which indicates that both scoliosis curve and primary etiopathogenic factor contribute to the sensory deficit in patients with AIS.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Etiopathogenisis; Somatosensory evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24099684     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  6 in total

Review 1.  Predictive value of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wengang Wang; Tailong Chen; Yibin Liu; Songsong Wang; Ningning Yang; Ming Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Verticality perception reveals a vestibular deficit in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Nikoleta Antoniadou; Vassilia Hatzitaki; Stavros Ι Stavridis; Eythimios Samoladas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  H-reflex changes in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Salaheldien Mohamed Alayat; Ehab Mohamed Abdel-Kafy; Ashraf Mohamed Abdelaal
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-09-15

4.  Intra-Operative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Patients with Intraspinal Abnormalities Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Junyin Qiu; Wanyou Liu; Benlong Shi; Yang Li; Huang Yan; Zezhang Zhu; Zhen Liu; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  How 'idiopathic' is adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review on associated abnormalities.

Authors:  Tom P C Schlösser; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Anne L Versteeg; René M Castelein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Alteration of cortical but not spinal inhibitory circuits in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Václav Boček; Martin Krbec; Peter Vaško; Karel Brabec; Markéta Pavlíková; Ivana Štětkářová
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 1.985

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.