Literature DB >> 24099548

The first time ever I saw your feet: inversion effect in newborns' sensitivity to biological motion.

Lara Bardi1, Lucia Regolin2, Francesca Simion3.   

Abstract

Inversion effect in biological motion perception has been recently attributed to an innate sensitivity of the visual system to the gravity-dependent dynamic of the motion. However, the specific cues that determine the inversion effect in naïve subjects were never investigated. In the present study, we have assessed the contribution of the local gravity-dependent motion (i.e., the orientation of individual dot trajectories) and the global configuration (i.e., the vertical location of the dots representing the feet within the display) in determining the inversion effect for biological motion in humans at birth. Results showed that 2-day-old newborns, at their 1st exposure to point-light displays, preferred a biological motion stimulus representing the legs of a walking animal compared with an identical display in which individual dot trajectories were locally inverted so that the motion violates the gravity force (Experiment 1). Interestingly, the global configuration affected the analysis of the gravity-dependent profile of dots motion. Indeed, the spontaneous preference disappeared when the local dots representing feet were embedded in a more complex global display and all the dots representing feet were located on the ground below the rest of the body (Experiment 2). Finally, results revealed that the orientation of the global configuration per se is not a crucial factor in determining newborns' preference (Experiment 3). These results suggest that humans possess an inborn predisposition about the direction of the gravity force that imprints biological motion and supports the hypothesis that a mechanism for the detection of biological motion is already at work before visual experience. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24099548     DOI: 10.1037/a0034678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  8 in total

1.  Modulation of biological motion perception in humans by gravity.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xue Zhang; Chunhui Wang; Weifen Huang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Wen Zhou; Shanguang Chen; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Great apes' understanding of biomechanics: eye-tracking experiments using three-dimensional computer-generated animations.

Authors:  Yutaro Sato; Michiteru Kitazaki; Shoji Itakura; Tomoyo Morita; Yoko Sakuraba; Masaki Tomonaga; Satoshi Hirata
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research.

Authors:  Lisa M Oakes
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014-04-05

4.  Bird expertise does not increase motion sensitivity to bird flight motion.

Authors:  Simen Hagen; Quoc C Vuong; Michael D Chin; Lisa S Scott; Tim Curran; James W Tanaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Current Understanding of What Infants See.

Authors:  Lea Hyvärinen; Renate Walthes; Namita Jacob; Kay Nottingham Chaplin; Mercè Leonhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2014

6.  Gravity-Dependent Animacy Perception in Zebrafish.

Authors:  Xiaohan Ma; Xiangyong Yuan; Jiahuan Liu; Li Shen; Yiwen Yu; Wen Zhou; Zuxiang Liu; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-08-30

7.  A comparison of form processing involved in the perception of biological and nonbiological movements.

Authors:  Steven M Thurman; Hongjing Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Preferential Attention to Biological Motion in 2- to 24-Month-Old Infants.

Authors:  Robin Sifre; Lindsay Olson; Scott Gillespie; Ami Klin; Warren Jones; Sarah Shultz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.