| Literature DB >> 24098323 |
Zhenqiang Wu1, Xiaoqing Zhang, Lu Shen, Yuyu Xiong, Xi Wu, Ran Huo, Zhiyun Wei, Lei Cai, Guoyang Qi, Qingqing Xu, Daxiang Cui, Donghong Cui, Gengchun Zhao, Lin He, Shengying Qin.
Abstract
The cytochrome P450 is the major enzyme involved in drug metabolism. Single CYP genotypes and metabolic phenotypes have been widely studied, but no combination analysis has been conducted in the context of specific populations and geographical areas. This study is the first to systematically analyze the combined genotypes and functional combinations of 400 samples of major CYP genes--CYP2E1, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 in four geographical areas of mainland China. 167 different genotype combinations were identified, of which 25 had a greater than 1% frequency in the Chinese Han population. In addition, phenotypes of the four genes for each sample were in line with the predictions of previous studies of the four geographical areas. On the basis of the genotype classification, we were able to produce a systemic functional combinations analysis for the population. 25 of the combinations detected had at least two non-wild phenotypes and four showed a frequency above 1%. A bioinformatics analysis of the relationship between particular drugs and multi-genes was conducted. This is the first systematic study to analyze genotype combinations and functional combinations across whole Chinese population and could make a significant contribution in the field of personalized medicine and therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24098323 PMCID: PMC3788764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The combined genotype frequency in four different geographical Chinese populations.
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 3.13% | 5.21% | 0 | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.264 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 3.13% | 1.04% | 3.13% | 0 | 1.82% | 0.059 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 4.17% | 7.29% | 9.38% | 5.21% | 6.51% | 0.501 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 2.08% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 3.13% | 2.34% | 0.317 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*10 | *1/*3 | *1/*1 | 4.17% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0.79 |
| *1/*1 | *1/*2 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.18 |
| *1/*1 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 2.08% | 4.17% | 5.21% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 0.165 |
| *1/*1 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 2.08% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 7.29% | 3.13% | 0.105 |
| *1/*1 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *2/*2 | 2.08% | 2.08% | 0 | 1.04% | 1.30% | 0.18 |
| *1/*1 | *2/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 2.08% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.819 |
| *1/*7 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 0 | 3.13% | 5.21% | 2.34% | 0.264 |
| *1/*7 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 0 | 3.13% | 0 | 3.13% | 1.56% | 0.434 |
| *1/*7 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 0 | 2.08% | 5.21% | 2.08% | 2.34% | 0.739 |
| *1/*7 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 1.04% | 4.17% | 2.08% | 0 | 1.82% | 0.368 |
| *1/*7 | *10/*41 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 3.13% | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.317 |
| *1/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 4.17% | 5.21% | 2.86% | 0.529 |
| *1/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 0 | 3.13% | 0 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.317 |
| *5/*7 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 3.13% | 0 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.30% | 0.655 |
| *5/*7 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 4.17% | 2.08% | 5.21% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 0.165 |
| *5/*7 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 3.13% | 3.13% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 2.08% | 0.157 |
| *5/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 3.13% | 4.17% | 2.34% | 0.717 |
| *5/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 3.13% | 1.04% | 0 | 3.13% | 1.82% | 0.059 |
| *7/*7 | *1/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 1.56% | 0.414 |
| *7/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*1 | 1.04% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 1.82% | 0.059 |
| *7/*7 | *10/*10 | *1/*1 | *1/*2 | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 3.13% | 1.04% | 0.317 |
a The P value is for the comparison of the combined genotype frequencies among the fourdifferent geographic populations
The phenotype frequency in four different geographical Chinese populations.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / |
| ( | 86.46% | 96.88% | 97.92% | 92.71% | 93.49% | 0.813 |
| ( | 4.17% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 4.17% | 2.60% | 0.058 |
| ( | 9.38% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 3.13% | 3.91% | 0.016 |
|
| ||||||
| ( | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.78% | 0.655 |
| ( | 66.67% | 61.46% | 63.54% | 50.00% | 60.42% | 0.436 |
| ( | 32.29% | 37.50% | 35.42% | 47.92% | 38.28% | 0.286 |
| ( | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.343 |
|
| ||||||
| ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / |
| ( | 83.33% | 92.71% | 79.17% | 96.88% | 88.02% | 0.492 |
| ( | 14.58% | 5.21% | 14.58% | 2.08% | 9.11% | 0.001 |
| ( | 2.08% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 0 | 1.30% | 0.18 |
|
| ||||||
| ( | 0 | 1.04% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 1.30% | 0.18 |
| ( | 44.79% | 43.75% | 72.92% | 52.08% | 53.39% | 0.017 |
| ( | 38.54% | 39.58% | 17.71% | 36.46% | 33.07% | 0.022 |
| ( | 15.63% | 14.58% | 6.25% | 8.33% | 11.20% | 0.084 |
b The P value is for the comparison of the metabolic phenotype frequencies among the fourdifferent geographic populations.
The functional combinations frequency of four CYP genes in four different geographical populations.
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IM | IM | EM | EM | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.825 |
| PM | IM | EM | EM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.08% | 0.52% | 0.652 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 3.12% | 1.04% | 0.317 | |||
| IM | EM | PM | EM | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.716 |
| PM | EM | IM | EM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.645 |
| Total | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.52% | 0.825 | |||
| IM | EM | EM | IM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.745 |
| PM | EM | EM | IM | 2.08% | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.78% | 0.654 |
| PM | EM | EM | PM | 3.12% | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0.26% | 0.463 |
| Total | 4.16% | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.414 | |||
| EM | IM | IM | EM | 2.08% | 1.04% | 5.21% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.368 |
| EM | IM | PM | EM | 0 | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0 | 0.52% | 0.364 |
| Total | 2.08% | 2.08% | 6.25% | 1.04% | 2.86% | 0.178 | |||
| EM | IM | EM | IM | 12.50% | 9.38% | 3.13% | 18.75% | 10.94% | 0.006 |
| EM | IM | EM | PM | 8.33% | 5.21% | 0 | 5.21% | 4.69% | 0.637 |
| EM | IM | EM | UM | 1.04% | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.541 |
| EM | PM | EM | IM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0.26% | 0.642 |
| EM | UM | EM | IM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.476 |
| Total | 9.37% | 15.63% | 3.13% | 27.08% | 16.93% | 0.001 | |||
| EM | EM | IM | IM | 1.04% | 1.04% | 2.08% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.522 |
| EM | EM | IM | PM | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.742 |
| EM | EM | PM | IM | 2.08% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.52% | 0.655 |
| Total | 3.12% | 2.08% | 2.08% | 0 | 1.82% | 0.714 | |||
| EM | IM | IM | IM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.754 |
| EM | IM | IM | PM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.623 |
| EM | IM | IM | UM | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 0.26% | 0.844 |
| EM | UM | IM | IM | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 0.26% | 0.423 |
| Total | 2.08% | 0 | 2.08% | 0 | 1.04% | 0.765 | |||
| IM | EM | IM | IM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.645 |
| Total | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.26% | 0.645 | |||
| IM | IM | EM | PM | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 1.04% | 0.52% | 0.324 |
| PM | IM | EM | IM | 2.08% | 1.04% | 0 | 0 | 0.78% | 0.564 |
| PM | IM | EM | PM | 1.04% | 0 | 1.04% | 0 | 0.52% | 0.825 |
| Total | 4.16% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.82% | 0.705 | |||
c The P value is for the comparison of the functional combinations frequencies among the fourdifferent geographic populations
Total CYP stands for non-EM (wild) phenotype in combination
Relationships between drugs and drug related genes.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Citalopram |
| Antidepressant medication |
| Fluvoxamine | CYP1A2, | Antidepressant medication |
| Imipramine |
| Antidepressant medication |
| Clopidogrel |
| Antiplatelet agent |
| Chlorzoxazone |
| Muscle relaxant |
| Modafinil |
| Stimulant-like drug |
| Nelfinavir |
| Antiretroviral drug |
| Phenprocoumon |
| Antiretroviral drug |
| Warfarin |
| Anticoagulant |
Figure 1Drug-gene relationship network centered on fluvoxamine.