Literature DB >> 24098173

Poly[tetra-methyl-ammonium [tri-μ2-formato-κ(6) O:O'-manganate(II)]].

Cai-Yun Han1, Min-Min Liu, Qin-Qin Dang.   

Abstract

In the title compound, {(C4H12N)[Mn(HCO2)3]} n , the Mn(II) atom lies on an inversion centre and is coordinated by O-atom donors from the three double-bridging formate ligands, one of which lies across a crystallographic mirror plane, giving a slightly distorted octahedral coordination sphere. A three-dimensional NaCl-type framework is generated in which the tetra-methyl-ammonium cations, which lie across mirror planes and occupy the cavities in the polymer structure, form weak C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the formate ligands.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098173      PMCID: PMC3790351          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related structures, see: Gao & Ng (2010 ▶); Wang et al. (2004 ▶, 2010 ▶). For background to the properties of structures with metalformate frameworks templated by protonated amines, see: Liu et al. (2012 ▶); Zhang et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

(C4H12N)[Mn(HCO2)3] M = 264.14 Orthorhombic, a = 8.926 (4) Å b = 12.767 (6) Å c = 9.196 (4) Å V = 1048.0 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 1.27 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.22 × 0.22 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.768, T max = 0.833 5907 measured reflections 1189 independent reflections 1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027 wR(F 2) = 0.075 S = 0.98 1189 reflections 77 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024045/zs2272sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813024045/zs2272Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
(C4H12N)[Mn(HCO2)3]F(000) = 548
Mr = 264.14Dx = 1.674 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnmaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2nCell parameters from 2391 reflections
a = 8.926 (4) Åθ = 3.2–28.6°
b = 12.767 (6) ŵ = 1.27 mm1
c = 9.196 (4) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1048.0 (8) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.22 × 0.22 × 0.15 mm
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer1189 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1012 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.023
Φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)h = −11→8
Tmin = 0.768, Tmax = 0.833k = −16→16
5907 measured reflectionsl = −11→11
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.075H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.041P)2 + 0.4246P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1189 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
77 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.43 e Å3
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.500000.500000.500000.0196 (1)
O10.48275 (14)0.66330 (9)0.41954 (13)0.0353 (4)
O20.29850 (13)0.45825 (9)0.37482 (12)0.0328 (3)
O30.13485 (14)0.45849 (10)0.19299 (12)0.0370 (4)
C10.4883 (3)0.750000.4754 (3)0.0294 (7)
C20.25485 (17)0.48251 (13)0.25112 (16)0.0264 (5)
N11.0114 (2)0.750000.4921 (2)0.0310 (7)
C31.0293 (4)0.750000.6524 (3)0.0565 (12)
C40.8494 (3)0.750000.4525 (4)0.0515 (10)
C51.0830 (2)0.65471 (15)0.4312 (2)0.0461 (6)
H10.498300.750000.576100.0350*
H20.319800.523400.196000.0320*
H3A1.134000.750000.676400.0680*
H3B0.982800.688600.692300.0680*
H4A0.839400.750000.348600.0620*
H4B0.802300.811400.491700.0620*
H5A1.187700.654800.454700.0690*
H5B1.070800.654100.327400.0690*
H5C1.036600.593600.472000.0690*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.0205 (2)0.0185 (2)0.0197 (2)−0.0002 (1)−0.0002 (1)0.0001 (1)
O10.0513 (8)0.0212 (6)0.0335 (7)0.0006 (5)−0.0021 (5)0.0020 (5)
O20.0316 (6)0.0361 (6)0.0306 (6)−0.0047 (5)−0.0094 (5)0.0038 (5)
O30.0361 (7)0.0417 (7)0.0332 (6)−0.0044 (6)−0.0128 (5)0.0073 (5)
C10.0396 (15)0.0277 (13)0.0210 (10)0.0000−0.0014 (9)0.0000
C20.0277 (9)0.0245 (7)0.0271 (9)−0.0021 (6)0.0012 (7)0.0010 (6)
N10.0359 (13)0.0271 (12)0.0301 (12)0.00000.0039 (8)0.0000
C30.103 (3)0.0385 (16)0.0279 (14)0.00000.0075 (15)0.0000
C40.0307 (14)0.0389 (15)0.085 (2)0.00000.0086 (15)0.0000
C50.0478 (11)0.0430 (11)0.0474 (11)0.0158 (9)−0.0043 (9)−0.0143 (9)
Mn1—O12.2176 (16)N1—C5iv1.484 (2)
Mn1—O22.2010 (15)C1—H10.9300
Mn1—O3i2.2089 (16)C2—H20.9300
Mn1—O1ii2.2176 (16)C3—H3A0.9600
Mn1—O2ii2.2010 (15)C3—H3B0.9600
Mn1—O3iii2.2089 (16)C3—H3Biv0.9600
O1—C11.2213 (17)C4—H4A0.9600
O2—C21.2417 (19)C4—H4B0.9600
O3—C21.236 (2)C4—H4Biv0.9600
N1—C41.491 (3)C5—H5A0.9600
N1—C51.484 (2)C5—H5B0.9600
N1—C31.483 (3)C5—H5C0.9600
O1—Mn1—O289.80 (4)O1—C1—O1iv130.0 (2)
O1—Mn1—O3i90.27 (5)O2—C2—O3127.33 (15)
O1—Mn1—O1ii180.00O1—C1—H1115.00
O1—Mn1—O2ii90.20 (4)O1iv—C1—H1115.00
O1—Mn1—O3iii89.73 (5)O3—C2—H2116.00
O2—Mn1—O3i91.89 (4)O2—C2—H2116.00
O1ii—Mn1—O290.20 (4)N1—C3—H3A109.00
O2—Mn1—O2ii180.00N1—C3—H3B109.00
O2—Mn1—O3iii88.11 (4)N1—C3—H3Biv109.00
O1ii—Mn1—O3i89.73 (5)H3A—C3—H3B109.00
O2ii—Mn1—O3i88.11 (4)H3A—C3—H3Biv109.00
O3i—Mn1—O3iii180.00H3B—C3—H3Biv110.00
O1ii—Mn1—O2ii89.80 (4)N1—C4—H4A109.00
O1ii—Mn1—O3iii90.27 (5)N1—C4—H4B109.00
O2ii—Mn1—O3iii91.89 (4)N1—C4—H4Biv109.00
Mn1—O1—C1135.15 (14)H4A—C4—H4B109.00
Mn1—O2—C2132.47 (11)H4A—C4—H4Biv109.00
Mn1v—O3—C2139.49 (11)H4B—C4—H4Biv110.00
C3—N1—C5109.20 (13)N1—C5—H5A109.00
C3—N1—C5iv109.20 (13)N1—C5—H5B109.00
C4—N1—C5108.99 (13)N1—C5—H5C109.00
C4—N1—C5iv108.99 (13)H5A—C5—H5B110.00
C5—N1—C5iv110.13 (15)H5A—C5—H5C109.00
C3—N1—C4110.3 (2)H5B—C5—H5C109.00
O2—Mn1—O1—C1132.4 (2)O1ii—Mn1—O2—C2−139.34 (14)
O3i—Mn1—O1—C140.5 (2)O3iii—Mn1—O2—C2−49.08 (14)
O2ii—Mn1—O1—C1−47.7 (2)Mn1—O1—C1—O1iv176.99 (17)
O3iii—Mn1—O1—C1−139.5 (2)Mn1—O2—C2—O3−176.16 (12)
O1—Mn1—O2—C240.66 (14)Mn1v—O3—C2—O2168.34 (12)
O3i—Mn1—O2—C2130.92 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3B···O3ii0.962.403.355 (3)176
C4—H4B···O2vi0.962.413.367 (3)171
C5—H5B···O1iii0.962.413.349 (3)167
Table 1

Selected bond lengths (Å)

Mn1—O12.2176 (16)
Mn1—O22.2010 (15)
Mn1—O3i 2.2089 (16)
Mn1—O1ii 2.2176 (16)
Mn1—O2ii 2.2010 (15)
Mn1—O3iii 2.2089 (16)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3B⋯O3ii 0.962.403.355 (3)176
C4—H4B⋯O2iv 0.962.413.367 (3)171
C5—H5B⋯O1iii 0.962.413.349 (3)167

Symmetry codes: (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  5 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Formate-based magnetic metal-organic frameworks templated by protonated amines.

Authors:  Zheming Wang; Keli Hu; Song Gao; Hayao Kobayashi
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 30.849

3.  Anionic NaCl-type frameworks of [Mn(II)(HCOO)(3)(-)], templated by alkylammonium, exhibit weak ferromagnetism.

Authors:  Zheming Wang; Bin Zhang; Takeo Otsuka; Katsuya Inoue; Hayao Kobayashi; Mohamedally Kurmoo
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  A new series of chiral metal formate frameworks of [HONH3][M(II)(HCOO)3] (M = Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, and Mg): synthesis, structures, and properties.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Ran Shang; Ke-Li Hu; Zhe-Ming Wang; Song Gao
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Poly[dimethyl-ammonium [tris-(μ(2)-formato-κO:O')cadmate(II)]].

Authors:  Shan Gao; Seik Weng Ng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-11-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.