Literature DB >> 24098058

Genotypic differences in behavioural entropy: unpredictable genotypes are composed of unpredictable individuals.

Judy A Stamps1, Julia B Saltz, V V Krishnan.   

Abstract

Intra-genotypic variability (IGV) occurs when individuals with the same genotype, raised in the same environment and then tested under the same conditions, express different trait values. Game theoretical and bet-hedging models have suggested two ways that a single genotype might generate variable behaviour when behavioural variation is discrete rather than continuous: behavioural polyphenism (a genotype produces different types of individuals, each of which consistently expresses a different type of behaviour) or stochastic variability (a genotype produces one type of individual who randomly expresses different types of behaviour over time). We first demonstrated significant differences across 14 natural genotypes of male Drosophila melanogaster in the variability (as measured by entropy) of their microhabitat choice, in an experiment in which each fly was allowed free access to four different types of habitat. We then tested four hypotheses about ways that within-individual variability might contribute to differences across genotypes in the variability of microhabitat choice. There was no empirical support for three hypotheses (behavioural polymorphism, consistent choice, or time-based choice), nor could our results be attributed to genotypic differences in activity levels. The stochastic variability hypothesis accurately predicted the slope and the intercept of the relationship across genotypes between entropy at the individual level and entropy at the genotype level. However, our initial version of the stochastic model slightly but significantly overestimated the values of individual entropy for each genotype, pointing to specific assumptions of this model that might need to be adjusted in future studies of the IGV of microhabitat choice. This is among a handful of recent studies to document genotypic differences in behavioural IGV, and the first to explore ways that genotypic differences in within-individual variability might contribute to differences among genotypes in the predictability of their behaviour.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; behavioural predictability; behavioural variability; intra individual variability; personality

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098058      PMCID: PMC3788645          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  30 in total

1.  The evolution of strategy variation: will an ESS evolve?

Authors:  Steven Hecht Orzack; W G S Hines
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Limits of predictability in human mobility.

Authors:  Chaoming Song; Zehui Qu; Nicholas Blumm; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity.

Authors:  Niels J Dingemanse; Anahita J N Kazem; Denis Réale; Jonathan Wright
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives.

Authors:  Judy Stamps; Ton G G Groothuis
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-11-24

5.  Plasticity and genotype × environment interactions for locomotion in Drosophila melanogaster larvae.

Authors:  Francisco Del Pino; Erika Salgado; Raúl Godoy-Herrera
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julia B Saltz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Unfolding personalities: the importance of studying ontogeny.

Authors:  Ton G G Groothuis; Fritz Trillmich
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Female C57BL/6 mice show consistent individual differences in spontaneous interaction with environmental enrichment that are predicted by neophobia.

Authors:  Michael D Walker; Georgia Mason
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Inheritance beyond plain heritability: variance-controlling genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xia Shen; Mats Pettersson; Lars Rönnegård; Örjan Carlborg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; James S Patterson; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Behavioral idiosyncrasy reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability.

Authors:  Julien F Ayroles; Sean M Buchanan; Chelsea O'Leary; Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria; Jennifer K Grenier; Andrew G Clark; Daniel L Hartl; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neuronal control of locomotor handedness in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sean M Buchanan; Jamey S Kain; Benjamin L de Bivort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Precise Quantification of Behavioral Individuality From 80 Million Decisions Across 183,000 Flies.

Authors:  Benjamin de Bivort; Sean Buchanan; Kyobi Skutt-Kakaria; Erika Gajda; Julien Ayroles; Chelsea O'Leary; Pablo Reimers; Jamilla Akhund-Zade; Rebecca Senft; Ryan Maloney; Sandra Ho; Zach Werkhoven; Matthew A-Y Smith
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.617

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.