Literature DB >> 24098005

Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).

J Gail Neely1, Jeffrey D Sharon, Evan M Graboyes, Randal C Paniello, Brian Nussenbaum, David J Grindler, Themistocles Dassopoulos.   

Abstract

"Comparative effectiveness research" (CER) is not a new concept; however, recently it has been popularized as a method to develop scientifically sound actionable data by which patients, physicians, payers, and policymakers may make informed health care decisions. Fundamental to CER is that the comparative data are derived from large diverse populations of patients assembled from point-of-care general primary care practices and that measured outcomes include patient value judgments. The challenge is to obtain scientifically valid data to be acted upon by decision-making stakeholders with potentially quite diversely different agenda. The process requires very thoughtful research designs modulated by complex statistical and analytic methods. This article is composed of a guiding narrative with an extensive set of tables outlining many of the details required in performing and understanding CER. It ends with short discussions of three example papers, limitations of the method, and how a practicing physician may view such reports.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research; comparative effectiveness research; effectiveness research; outcomes research

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24098005     DOI: 10.1177/0194599813506539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  1 in total

Review 1.  Design characteristics of comparative effectiveness trials for the relief of symptomatic dyspepsia: A systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie Elliott; Amie Steel; Bradley Leech; Wenbo Peng
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2020-09-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.