Literature DB >> 24097631

Intensive induction is effective in selected octogenarian acute myeloid leukemia patients: prognostic significance of karyotype and selected molecular markers used in the European LeukemiaNet classification.

Meir Wetzler1, Krzysztof Mrózek, Jessica Kohlschmidt, Hervé Dombret, Hartmut Döhner, Sylvain Pilorge, Utz Krug, Andrew J Carroll, Richard A Larson, Guido Marcucci, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Thomas Büchner, Clara D Bloomfield.   

Abstract

We investigated whether octogenarian patients with acute myeloid leukemia enrolled onto Cooperative Group clinical trials and treated with intensive induction therapy could be cured, and whether karyotype and selected molecular markers had any prognostic significance in these patients. Among 138 patients with cytogenetic information, normal karyotype was the most common (47.1%) followed by complex karyotype (14.5%) and sole +8 (9.4%). Among these patients, the relapse-free survival rate at 1 year was 37% and 13% at 3 years, and the respective overall survival rates were 24% and 8%. Whereas the 90 patients who survived beyond 30 days had the same relapse-free survival rates, their 1-year and 3-year overall survival rates were 36% and 11%, respectively. Of the 66 patients surviving beyond 30 days who could be classified into European LeukemiaNet genetic groups, those in the intermediate-I group had better overall survival than patients in the adverse group (P=0.01). Among patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia who were tested for the European LeukemiaNet-associated molecular alterations, FLT3-internal tandem duplication and NPM1 mutations, it was found that FLT3-internal tandem duplication (detected in 29% of patients) did not associate with overall survival (P=0.31), whereas NPM1 mutations (30%) were associated with a significantly longer overall survival (P=0.002). We conclude that intensive induction is effective and indicated in selected octogenarians with acute myeloid leukemia, that their overall survival varies among the European LeukemiaNet genetic groups and that NPM1 mutations may be of prognostic significance among octogenarian patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24097631      PMCID: PMC3912961          DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2013.092072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  43 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of risk group stratification in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  A Wahlin; B Markevärn; I Golovleva; M Nilsson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Results of intensive chemotherapy in 998 patients age 65 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: predictive prognostic models for outcome.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Susan O'brien; Jorge Cortes; Francis Giles; Stefan Faderl; Elias Jabbour; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; William Wierda; Sherry Pierce; Jianqin Shan; Elihu Estey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Parallel phase I studies of daunorubicin given with cytarabine and etoposide with or without the multidrug resistance modulator PSC-833 in previously untreated patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results of cancer and leukemia group B study 9420.

Authors:  E J Lee; S L George; M Caligiuri; T P Szatrowski; B L Powell; S Lemke; R K Dodge; R Smith; M Baer; C A Schiffer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Authors:  S P Whitman; K J Archer; L Feng; C Baldus; B Becknell; B D Carlson; A J Carroll; K Mrózek; J W Vardiman; S L George; J E Kolitz; R A Larson; C D Bloomfield; M A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard D Brunning
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The benefit of induction chemotherapy in patients age > or = 75 years.

Authors:  Norbert Vey; Diane Coso; Valerie-Jeanne Bardou; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Anne-Chantal Braud; Reda Bouabdallah; Daniele Sainty; Marie-Joelle Mozziconacci; Marina Lafage; Gandhi Damaj; Didier Blaise; Jean-Albert Gastaut; Dominique Maraninchi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; John M Bennett; Kenneth J Kopecky; Thomas Büchner; Cheryl L Willman; Elihu H Estey; Charles A Schiffer; Hartmut Doehner; Martin S Tallman; T Andrew Lister; Francesco Lo-Coco; Roel Willemze; Andrea Biondi; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Richard A Larson; Bob Löwenberg; Miguel A Sanz; David R Head; Ryuzo Ohno; Clara D Bloomfield; Francesco LoCocco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The influence of age on prognosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia differs according to cytogenetic subgroups.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger; Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Cytogenetics in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek; Nyla A Heerema; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.250

10.  Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461).

Authors:  John C Byrd; Krzysztof Mrózek; Richard K Dodge; Andrew J Carroll; Colin G Edwards; Diane C Arthur; Mark J Pettenati; Shivanand R Patil; Kathleen W Rao; Michael S Watson; Prasad R K Koduru; Joseph O Moore; Richard M Stone; Robert J Mayer; Eric J Feldman; Frederick R Davey; Charles A Schiffer; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Elderly acute myeloid leukemia: assessing risk.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Aging and malignant hemopathies.

Authors:  Dominique Bron; Lionel Ades; Tamas Fulop; Valentin Goede
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Treatment patterns and outcomes of octogenarian patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Vijaya R Bhatt; Valerie Shostrom; James O Armitage; Krishna Gundabolu
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Patterns of Care and Survival for Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Elderly.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 6.  Definition of Unfit for Standard Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Management of older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  R B Walter; E H Estey
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes in older adults.

Authors:  Heidi D Klepin; Arati V Rao; Timothy S Pardee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  HLA-Mismatched Microtransplant in Older Patients Newly Diagnosed With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Microtransplantation Interest Group.

Authors:  Mei Guo; Nelson J Chao; Jian-Yong Li; David A Rizzieri; Qi-Yun Sun; Ann Mohrbacher; Elizabeth F Krakow; Wan-Jun Sun; Xu-Liang Shen; Xin-Rong Zhan; De-Pei Wu; Li Liu; Juan Wang; Min Zhou; Lin-Hua Yang; Yang-Yi Bao; Zheng Dong; Bo Cai; Kai-Xun Hu; Chang-Lin Yu; Jian-Hui Qiao; Hong-Li Zuo; Ya-Jing Huang; Anthony D Sung; Jun-Xiao Qiao; Zhi-Qing Liu; Tie-Qiang Liu; Bo Yao; Hong-Xia Zhao; Si-Xuan Qian; Wei-Wei Liu; Rafael Forés; Rafael F Duarte; Hui-Sheng Ai
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  An intensive approach to treatment for older patients with relapsed isolated NPM1 mutated AML.

Authors:  Srivasavi Dukka; David T Bowen
Journal:  Leuk Res Rep       Date:  2015-01-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.