Literature DB >> 24097409

Tissue differences in BER-related incision activity and non-specific nuclease activity as measured by the comet assay.

Joanna P Gorniak1, Kerry M Cameron, Kevin J Waldron, Thomas von Zglinicki, John C Mathers, Sabine A S Langie.   

Abstract

DNA repair mechanisms are important for genome stability and to prevent accumulation of DNA damage, which contributes to cellular ageing and cancer development. Study of these physiological processes requires robust and practical assays to quantify DNA repair capacity. The in vitro comet-based assay is a simple, yet reliable, assay for measurement of DNA repair and has been modified recently to quantify DNA incision activity in mouse brain and liver. In this study, we applied this assay to assess DNA incision activity in other mouse tissues, i.e. lung and colon, and found that high, non-specific nuclease activity was a problem when measuring DNA incision activity, especially in the colon. We tested the utility of multiple optimisation steps including addition of aphidicolin, ATP and polyAT and used multiple wash steps, which resulted in modest improvements in performance of the assay. Washing the tissues before protein extraction and decreasing the protein concentration in the assay were the most effective steps in reducing non-specific nuclease activity. Using the comet-based assay with these further modifications, we found that base excision repair incision activity changed with age differently in each tissue. This study shows that non-specific nuclease activity in the comet-based assay for DNA repair is more pronounced in some tissues than others so care should be taken to optimise the protocol when applying the assay to a new tissue. Our data suggest the importance of using control cells (noRo cells incubated with extract) in the assay to assess for non-specific nuclease activity. In conclusion, the comet-based DNA repair assay can be easily adapted to study a range of mammalian tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24097409     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/get047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  5 in total

1.  A rapid, safe, and quantitative in vitro assay for measurement of uracil-DNA glycosylase activity.

Authors:  Tiziana Squillaro; Mauro Finicelli; Nicola Alessio; Stefania Del Gaudio; Giovanni Di Bernardo; Mariarosa Anna Beatrice Melone; Gianfranco Peluso; Umberto Galderisi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Impact of Weight Loss Strategies on Obesity-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Tahereh Setayesh; Miroslav Mišík; Sabine A S Langie; Roger Godschalk; Monika Waldherr; Thomas Bauer; Sabine Leitner; Christoph Bichler; Gerhard Prager; Georg Krupitza; Alexander Haslberger; Siegfried Knasmüller
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.914

3.  An optimized comet-based in vitro DNA repair assay to assess base and nucleotide excision repair activity.

Authors:  Sona Vodenkova; Amaya Azqueta; Andrew Collins; Maria Dusinska; Isabel Gaivão; Peter Møller; Alena Opattova; Pavel Vodicka; Roger W L Godschalk; Sabine A S Langie
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Comet assay to measure DNA repair: approach and applications.

Authors:  Amaya Azqueta; Jana Slyskova; Sabine A S Langie; Isabel O'Neill Gaivão; Andrew Collins
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  A Multi-Endpoint Approach to Base Excision Repair Incision Activity Augmented by PARylation and DNA Damage Levels in Mice: Impact of Sex and Age.

Authors:  Nicola Winkelbeiner; Viktoria K Wandt; Franziska Ebert; Kristina Lossow; Ezgi E Bankoglu; Maximilian Martin; Aswin Mangerich; Helga Stopper; Julia Bornhorst; Anna P Kipp; Tanja Schwerdtle
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.