Literature DB >> 24097301

New supraglottic airway with built-in pressure indicator decreases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

David T Wong1, Amanda D Tam, Vanita Mehta, Raviraj Raveendran, Waleed Riad, Frances F Chung.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Excessive supraglottic airway cuff pressure increases postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms such as sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia. A new supraglottic airway, AES Ultra CPV™ (CPV), has a built-in intracuff pressure indicator. We hypothesized that using the CPV would reduce postoperative symptoms when compared with the LMA Classic™ (LMA) without intracuff pressure guidance.
METHODS: Ambulatory patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomized to either CPV or LMA. A size 3/4/5 was inserted according to manufacturer guidelines. Nitrous oxide was not used. In the LMA Group, the cuff was inflated according to manufacturer's guidelines. In the CPV Group, a CPV was inserted and the cuff inflated until the indicator was in the green zone (30-44 mmHg). Intracuff pressures were measured at five minutes and 20 min post-insertion in both groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms, defined as sore throat, dysphonia, and/or dysphagia at one, two, and/or 24 hr postoperatively. Continuous data were compared using Student's t test and categorical data were analyzed using Chi square analysis.
RESULTS: The study included 170 patients, 85 per group. The mean (SD) intracuff pressure in the CPV group was significantly lower [44 (4) mmHg] than in the LMA Group [87 (37) mmHg]; P < 0.001. The incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms was significantly lower in the CPV Group than in the LMA Group (26% vs 49%; P = 0.002). The absolute risk reduction was 24%, and the number-needed-to-treat was 4.3.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal symptoms in the CPV Group with a cuff pressure-guided strategy was significantly lower than in the LMA Group with standard practice. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01800344).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24097301     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-013-0044-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  12 in total

1.  Spring recoil and supraglottic airway devices: lessons from the law of conservation of energy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Sorbello; Ivana Zdravkovic; Rita Cataldo; Ida Di Giacinto
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

2.  Comparison Between the Protector™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Endotracheal Tube for Minimally Invasive Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery.

Authors:  Georgios Kotsovolis; Ioannis Pliakos; Stavros Panidis; Dimitrios Gkinas; Theodosios Papavramidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  [Continuous cuff pressure measurement during laryngeal mask anesthesia : An obligatory measure to avoid postoperative complications].

Authors:  M Hensel; T Güldenpfennig; A Schmidt; M Krumm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparison of early postoperative recovery between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Se Hee Kang; MiHye Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy after the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Protector.

Authors:  Li Yeen Tham; Zhi Yuen Beh; Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin; Chew Yin Wang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-15

6.  Risk factors for postoperative sore throat associated with i-gel™, a supraglottic airway device.

Authors:  Tomoya Taniguchi; Tasuku Fujii; Nanako Taniguchi; Kimitoshi Nishiwaki
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 0.794

7.  Comparison of intragastric pressure between endotracheal tube and supraglottic airway devices in laparoscopic hepatectomy: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study.

Authors:  Jin Hee Ahn; Ji Seon Jeong; Se Hee Kang; Ji Eun Yeon; Eun A Cho; Gyu Sung Choi; Jong Man Kim; Gaab Soo Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Measuring endotracheal tube intracuff pressure: no room for complacency.

Authors:  Chandra M Kumar; Edwin Seet; Tom C R V Van Zundert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Detrimental Effects of Filling Laryngotracheal Airways To Excessive Pressure (DEFLATE-P): a quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Ashley V Fritz; Gregory J Mickus; Michael A Vega; J Ross Renew; Sorin J Brull
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  The case for a 3rd generation supraglottic airway device facilitating direct vision placement.

Authors:  André A J Van Zundert; Chandra M Kumar; Tom C R V Van Zundert; Stephen P Gatt; Jaideep J Pandit
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.