Literature DB >> 24096179

The "anathema" of arbitrary categorization of continuous predictors.

Anthony M Vintzileos1, Yinka Oyelese2, Cande V Ananth3.   

Abstract

In medicine in general, and in obstetrics in particular, it is common practice to use arbitrary cutoffs in expressing continuous variables. However, the dichotomy of continuous data is associated with loss of statistical power, which may result in inaccurate estimates in clinical prognosis or prediction of outcomes and, consequently, may lead to incorrect inferences. If the predictor is a continuous variable, arbitrary percentile-based categorizations without clinical justification is an anathema (Greek word meaning "curse") and should be discouraged. Instead, the clinical outcome of interest should be defined first and then a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis or other appropriate statistical techniques should be employed to determine the most optimal cutoff of the predictor. The next step should be to validate the cutoff in a different population before introducing it to clinical use or interventional trials.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  continuous predictors; cutoff points

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24096179     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  1 in total

1.  Continuous variable transformation in anesthesia: useful clinical shorthand, but threat to research.

Authors:  Olubukola O Nafiu; Brenda W Gillespie; Alex Tsodikov
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.892

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.