Literature DB >> 24096007

Are hungry sheep more pessimistic? The effects of food restriction on cognitive bias and the involvement of ghrelin in its regulation.

Else Verbeek1, Drewe Ferguson, Caroline Lee.   

Abstract

Food restriction is considered to be a welfare issue in extensively reared animals. However, the effects of food restriction on the affective state, and its physiological regulation, are unknown. In Experiment 1, we aimed to assess the effects of increased plasma concentrations of acyl-ghrelin on judgement bias (an indicator of affective states) by fasting sheep for 24h or by ghrelin administration. In Experiment 2, we aimed to assess the effects of chronic food restriction on judgement bias and attention bias towards a food-related cue. For the judgement bias test, sheep were trained in an arena to approach a positive location cue associated with conspecifics and not approach a negative location cue associated with a dog. Three non-trained, non-reinforced ambiguous location cues were situated between the positive and negative locations. Attention bias towards a food-related cue was assessed by placing an empty food bucket against the wall of the arena halfway between the entry point and the positive location. In Experiment 1, sheep were divided into three treatments; 24h fast, ghrelin administration or control. Judgement bias, locomotor activity and plasma cortisol concentrations were assessed. The ghrelin treated group tended to express a more pessimistic bias compared to the control group (P<0.1), and plasma cortisol concentrations tended to be increased (P<0.1). In Experiment 2, sheep were subjected to a high feeding level (HF) or low feeding level (LF) for 7days. The LF group tended to show a more optimistic judgement bias (P<0.1). When the food-related cue was presented, LF ewes took longer to reach the positive location (P<0.001), spent longer with their head inside the bucket (P<0.001) and more time interacting with the bucket (P<0.01). This study provides preliminary evidence that food restriction alters judgement bias and attention bias towards a food-related cue which may indicate altered affective states of sheep.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective states; Attention bias; Cognitive bias; Food restriction; Ghrelin; Sheep; Welfare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24096007     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  16 in total

1.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

2.  Judgment Bias During Gestation in Domestic Pigs.

Authors:  Emily V Bushby; Sheena C Cotter; Anna Wilkinson; Mary Friel; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Carlotta Burani; Annalisa Pelosi; Paola Valsecchi
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Supplementation of Lactobacillus early in life alters attention bias to threat in piglets.

Authors:  Else Verbeek; Johan Dicksved; Linda Keeling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evaluating pharmacological models of high and low anxiety in sheep.

Authors:  Rebecca E Doyle; Caroline Lee; David M McGill; Michael Mendl
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Judgement bias in goats (Capra hircus): investigating the effects of human grooming.

Authors:  Luigi Baciadonna; Christian Nawroth; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Learning and Judgment Can Be Affected by Predisposed Fearfulness in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Elske N de Haas; Caroline Lee; T Bas Rodenburg
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 8.  Modelling cognitive affective biases in major depressive disorder using rodents.

Authors:  Claire A Hales; Sarah A Stuart; Michael H Anderson; Emma S J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Emotion Evaluation and Response Slowing in a Non-Human Primate: New Directions for Cognitive Bias Measures of Animal Emotion?

Authors:  Emily J Bethell; Amanda Holmes; Ann MacLarnon; Stuart Semple
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-11

10.  Happy hamsters? Enrichment induces positive judgement bias for mildly (but not truly) ambiguous cues to reward and punishment in Mesocricetus auratus.

Authors:  Emily J Bethell; Nicola F Koyama
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.