Literature DB >> 24095057

Neck posture and muscle activity are different when upside down: a human volunteer study.

Robyn S Newell1, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, John Street, Peter A Cripton, Gunter P Siegmund.   

Abstract

Rollover crashes are dynamic and complex events in which head impacts with the roof can cause catastrophic neck injuries. Ex vivo and computational models are valuable in understanding, and ultimately preventing, these injuries. Although neck posture and muscle activity influence the resulting injury, there is currently no in vivo data describing these parameters immediately prior to a head-first impact. The specific objectives of this study were to determine the in vivo neck vertebral alignment and muscle activation levels when upside down, a condition that occurs during a rollover. Eleven human subjects (6F, 5M) were tested while seated upright and inverted in a custom-built apparatus. Vertebral alignment was measured using fluoroscopy and muscle activity was recorded using surface and indwelling electrodes in eight superficial and deep neck muscles. In vivo vertebral alignment and muscle activation levels differed between the upright and inverted conditions. When inverted and relaxed, the neck was more lordotic, C1 was aligned posterior to C7, the Frankfort plane was extended, and the activity of six muscles increased compared to upright and relaxed. When inverted subjects were asked to look forward to eliminate head extension, flexor muscle activity increased, C7 was more flexed, and C1 was aligned anterior to C7 versus upright and relaxed. Combined with the large inter-subject variability observed, these findings indicate that cadaveric or computational models designed to study injuries and prevention devices while inverted need to consider a variety of postures and muscle conditions to be relevant to the in vivo situation.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; Fluoroscopy; Muscles; Neck injury; Posture; Rollovers; Upside down

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24095057     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Perspective: Protecting the neck.

Authors:  Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sensitivity of the Cervical Disc Loads, Translations, Intradiscal Pressure, and Muscle Activity Due to Segmental Mass, Disc Stiffness, and Muscle Strength in an Upright Neutral Posture.

Authors:  Rizwan Arshad; Hendrik Schmidt; Marwan El-Rich; Kodjo Moglo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  From maturity to old age: tasks of daily life require a different muscle use in horses.

Authors:  R R Zsoldos; B Krüger; T F Licka
Journal:  Comp Exerc Physiol       Date:  2014-07-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.