Literature DB >> 24094731

Derivation of guideline values for gold (III) ion toxicity limits to protect aquatic ecosystems.

Sun-Hwa Nam1, Woo-Mi Lee, Yu-Jin Shin, Sung-Ji Yoon, Shin Woong Kim, Jin Il Kwak, Youn-Joo An.   

Abstract

This study focused on estimating the toxicity values of various aquatic organisms exposed to gold (III) ion (Au(3+)), and to propose maximum guideline values for Au(3+) toxicity that protect the aquatic ecosystem. A comparative assessment of methods developed in Australia and New Zealand versus the European Community (EC) was conducted. The test species used in this study included two bacteria (Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis), one alga (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), one euglena (Euglena gracilis), three cladocerans (Daphnia magna, Moina macrocopa, and Simocephalus mixtus), and two fish (Danio rerio and Oryzias latipes). Au(3+) induced growth inhibition, mortality, immobilization, and/or developmental malformations in all test species, with responses being concentration-dependent. According to the moderate reliability method of Australia and New Zealand, 0.006 and 0.075 mg/L of guideline values for Au(3+) were obtained by dividing 0.33 and 4.46 mg/L of HC5 and HC50 species sensitivity distributions (SSD) with an FACR (Final Acute to Chronic Ratio) of 59.09. In contrast, the EC method uses an assessment factor (AF), with the 0.0006 mg/L guideline value for Au(3+) being divided with the 48-h EC50 value for 0.60 mg/L (the lowest toxicity value obtained from short term results) by an AF of 1000. The Au(3+) guideline value derived using an AF was more stringent than the SSD. We recommend that more toxicity data using various bioassays are required to develop more accurate ecological risk assessments. More chronic/long-term exposure studies on sensitive endpoints using additional fish species and invertebrates not included in the current dataset will be needed to use other derivation methods (e.g., US EPA and Canadian Type A) or the "High Reliability Method" from Australia/New Zealand. Such research would facilitate the establishment of guideline values for various pollutants that reflect the universal effects of various pollutants in aquatic ecosystems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to suggest guideline values for Au(3+) levels permitted to enter freshwater environments.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystem; Gold (III) ion (Au(3+)); Guidelines; Predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC); Species sensitivity distribution (SSD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094731     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Gold (I) and (III) Ions and Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  T P Shareena Dasari; Y Zhang; H Yu
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol (Los Angel)       Date:  2015-12-20

2.  Dye-Labeled Polyacryloyl Hydrazide-Ag Nanoparticle Fluorescent Probe for Ultrasensitive and Selective Detection of Au Ion.

Authors:  Rewati Raman Ujjwal; Chandan Sona; Suman Debnath; Prem Narayan Yadav; Umaprasana Ojha
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-08-07

3.  The Influence of Available Cu and Au Nanoparticles (NPs) on the Survival of Water Fleas (Daphnia pulex).

Authors:  Małgorzata Garncarek; Monika Kowalska-Góralska; Magdalena Senze; Katarzyna Czyż
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Toxicity of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): A review.

Authors:  A Sani; C Cao; D Cui
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-04-10

5.  Silver and Hyaluronic Acid-Coated Gold Nanoparticles Modulate the Metabolism of a Model Human Gut Bacterium Lactobacillus casei.

Authors:  Wenqian Huang; Yirong Zhang; Zhi Li; Minjie Li; Fangfang Li; Monika Mortimer; Liang-Hong Guo
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.719

6.  Understanding gold toxicity in aerobically-grown Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C Muñoz-Villagrán; F Contreras; F Cornejo; M Figueroa; D Valenzuela-Bezanilla; R Luraschi; C Reinoso; J Rivas-Pardo; C Vásquez; M Castro; F Arenas
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.