Alex Fong1, Allison Serra2, Tiffany Herrero3, Deyu Pan4, Dotun Ogunyemi5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA. Electronic address: alexf@hs.uci.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science, Research Life Sciences Institute, Los Angeles, CA. 5. David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the clinical and demographic differences in patients with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) compared to those with gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: Using the 2001-2007 California Health Discharge Database, we identified 22,331 cases of PGDM and 147,097 cases of GDM via ICD-9-CM codes after excluding cases which were missing race or age data or with extremes of age. Data analyzed included demographics, pre-existing medical conditions, antepartum complications, and intrapartum complications. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Both PGDM and GDM incidences increased during the study period. Advancing age was associated with increased prevalence of both diseases. Although Asians were found to have the highest prevalence of GDM, they, along with Caucasians, were found have the lowest prevalence of PGDM. Conditions with increased frequency in PGDM versus GDM included chronic hypertension, renal disease, thyroid dysfunction, fetal CNS malformation, fetal demise, pyelonephritis, and eclampsia. Subjects with PGDM were more likely than those with GDM to have a shoulder dystocia, failed induction of labor, or undergo cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated clinical morbidities and demographic factors which differ in patients with PGDM compared to patients with GDM. Our findings suggest PGDM to be associated with significantly higher morbidity when compared to GDM. Our findings also suggest that races with the highest tendency for GDM during pregnancy may not necessarily have the highest tendency for PGDM outside of pregnancy.
AIMS: To assess the clinical and demographic differences in patients with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) compared to those with gestational diabetes (GDM). METHODS: Using the 2001-2007 California Health Discharge Database, we identified 22,331 cases of PGDM and 147,097 cases of GDM via ICD-9-CM codes after excluding cases which were missing race or age data or with extremes of age. Data analyzed included demographics, pre-existing medical conditions, antepartum complications, and intrapartum complications. Logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Both PGDM and GDM incidences increased during the study period. Advancing age was associated with increased prevalence of both diseases. Although Asians were found to have the highest prevalence of GDM, they, along with Caucasians, were found have the lowest prevalence of PGDM. Conditions with increased frequency in PGDM versus GDM included chronic hypertension, renal disease, thyroid dysfunction, fetal CNS malformation, fetal demise, pyelonephritis, and eclampsia. Subjects with PGDM were more likely than those with GDM to have a shoulder dystocia, failed induction of labor, or undergo cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated clinical morbidities and demographic factors which differ in patients with PGDM compared to patients with GDM. Our findings suggest PGDM to be associated with significantly higher morbidity when compared to GDM. Our findings also suggest that races with the highest tendency for GDM during pregnancy may not necessarily have the highest tendency for PGDM outside of pregnancy.
Authors: Lee K Taylor; Susan Travis; Margaret Pym; Emily Olive; David J Henderson-Smart Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Aidan McElduff; Glynis P Ross; Janet A Lagström; Bernard Champion; Jeff R Flack; Sue-Mei Lau; Robert G Moses; Sivanthi Seneratne; Mark McLean; N Wah Cheung Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Catherine C Cowie; Keith F Rust; Danita D Byrd-Holt; Mark S Eberhardt; Katherine M Flegal; Michael M Engelgau; Sharon H Saydah; Desmond E Williams; Linda S Geiss; Edward W Gregg Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Shagufta Yasmeen; Patrick S Romano; Michael E Schembri; Janet M Keyzer; William M Gilbert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Nellie I Hansen; Edward F Bell; Jane E Brumbaugh; Barbara J Stoll; Abbot R Laptook; Seetha Shankaran; Myra H Wyckoff; Tarah T Colaizy; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Michael E Silverman; Abraham Reichenberg; David A Savitz; Sven Cnattingius; Paul Lichtenstein; Christina M Hultman; Henrik Larsson; Sven Sandin Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2017-01-18 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Evan B Selzer; Delphine Blain; Robert B Hufnagel; Philip J Lupo; Laura E Mitchell; Brian P Brooks Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 6.197
Authors: Melissa I March; Anna M Modest; Steven J Ralston; Michele R Hacker; Munish Gupta; Florence M Brown Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Date: 2015-05-11