Literature DB >> 24094531

Factors affecting variation of different measures of cheese yield and milk nutrient recovery from an individual model cheese-manufacturing process.

C Cipolat-Gotet1, A Cecchinato, M De Marchi, G Bittante.   

Abstract

Cheese yield (CY) is the most important technological trait of milk, because cheese-making uses a very high proportion of the milk produced worldwide. Few studies have been carried out at the level of individual milk-producing animals due to a scarcity of appropriate procedures for model-cheese production, the complexity of cheese-making, and the frequent use of the fat and protein (or casein) contents of milk as a proxy for cheese yield. Here, we report a high-throughput cheese manufacturing process that mimics all phases of cheese-making, uses 1.5-L samples of milk from individual animals, and allows the simultaneous processing of 15 samples per run. Milk samples were heated (35°C for 40 min), inoculated with starter culture (90 min), mixed with rennet (51.2 international milk-clotting units/L of milk), and recorded for gelation time. Curds were cut twice (10 and 15 min after gelation), separated from the whey, drained (for 30 min), pressed (3 times, 20 min each, with the wheel turned each time), salted in brine (for 60 min), weighed, and sampled. Whey was collected, weighed, and sampled. Milk, curd, and whey samples were analyzed for pH, total solids, fat content, and protein content, and energy content was estimated. Three measures of percentage cheese yield (%CY) were calculated: %CY(CURD), %CY(SOLIDS), and %CY(WATER), representing the ratios between the weight of fresh curd, the total solids of the curd, and the water content of the curd, respectively, and the weight of the milk processed. In addition, 3 measures of daily cheese yield (dCY, kg/d) were defined, considering the daily milk yield. Three measures of nutrient recovery (REC) were computed: REC(FAT), REC(PROTEIN), and REC(SOLIDS), which represented the ratio between the weights of the fat, protein, and total solids in the curd, respectively, and the corresponding components in the milk. Energy recovery, REC(ENERGY), represented the energy content of the cheese compared with that in the milk. This procedure was used to process individual milk samples obtained from 1,167 Brown Swiss cows reared in 85 herds of the province of Trento (Italy). The assessed traits exhibited almost normal distributions, with the exception of REC(FAT). The average values (± SD) were as follows: %CY(CURD)=14.97±1.86, %CY(SOLIDS)=7.18±0.92, %CY(WATER)=7.77±1.27, dCY(CURD)=3.63±1.17, dCY(SOLIDS)=1.74±0.57, dCY(WATER)=1.88±0.63, REC(FAT)=89.79±3.55, REC(PROTEIN)=78.08±2.43, REC(SOLIDS)=51.88±3.52, and REC(ENERGY)=67.19±3.29. All traits were highly influenced by herd-test-date and days in milk of the cow, moderately influenced by parity, and weakly influenced by the utilized vat. Both %CY(CURD) and dCY(CURD) depended not only on the fat and protein (casein) contents of the milk, but also on their proportions retained in the curd; the water trapped in curd presented an higher variability than that of %CY(SOLIDS). All REC traits were variable and affected by days in milk and parity of the cows. The described model cheese-making procedure and the results obtained provided new insight into the phenotypic variation of cheese yield and recovery traits at the individual level.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cheese-making; fat and protein recovery; individual cheese yield; whey loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094531     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  8 in total

1.  Physiological and lactation responses of Egyptian dairy Baladi goats to natural thermal stress under subtropical environmental conditions.

Authors:  Mahmoud S El-Tarabany; Akram A El-Tarabany; Mostafa A Atta
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Bayesian regression models outperform partial least squares methods for predicting milk components and technological properties using infrared spectral data.

Authors:  A Ferragina; G de los Campos; A I Vazquez; A Cecchinato; G Bittante
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  From cow to cheese: genetic parameters of the flavour fingerprint of cheese investigated by direct-injection mass spectrometry (PTR-ToF-MS).

Authors:  Matteo Bergamaschi; Alessio Cecchinato; Franco Biasioli; Flavia Gasperi; Bruno Martin; Giovanni Bittante
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  SNP co-association and network analyses identify E2F3, KDM5A and BACH2 as key regulators of the bovine milk fatty acid profile.

Authors:  Sara Pegolo; Christos Dadousis; Núria Mach; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Marcello Mele; Giuseppe Conte; Stefano Schiavon; Giovanni Bittante; Alessio Cecchinato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Milk Products from Minor Dairy Species: A Review.

Authors:  Michele Faccia; Angela Gabriella D'Alessandro; Andrea Summer; Yonas Hailu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effect of Dairy, Season, and Sampling Position on Physical Properties of Trentingrana Cheese: Application of an LMM-ASCA Model.

Authors:  Michele Ricci; Flavia Gasperi; Isabella Endrizzi; Leonardo Menghi; Danny Cliceri; Pietro Franceschi; Eugenio Aprea
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Integration of GWAS, pathway and network analyses reveals novel mechanistic insights into the synthesis of milk proteins in dairy cows.

Authors:  Sara Pegolo; Núria Mach; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Stefano Schiavon; Giovanni Bittante; Alessio Cecchinato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Integrated PTR-ToF-MS, GWAS and biological pathway analyses reveal the contribution of cow's genome to cheese volatilome.

Authors:  Sara Pegolo; Matteo Bergamaschi; Flavia Gasperi; Franco Biasioli; Alessio Cecchinato; Giovanni Bittante
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.