BACKGROUND AIMS: Advantages associated with the use of cord blood (CB) transplantation include the availability of cryopreserved units, ethnic diversity and lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease compared with bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood. However, poor engraftment remains a major obstacle. We and others have found that ex vivo fucosylation can enhance engraftment in murine models, and now ex vivo treatment of CB with fucosyltransferase (FT) VI before transplantation is under clinical evaluation (NCT01471067). However, FTVII appears to be more relevant to hematopoietic cells and may alter acceptor substrate diversity. The present study compared the ability of FTVI and FTVII to improve the rapidity, magnitude, multi-lineage and multi-tissue engraftment of human CB hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in vivo. METHODS: CD34-selected CB HSPCs were treated with recombinant FTVI, FTVII or mock control and then injected into immunodeficient mice and monitored for multi-lineage and multi-tissue engraftment. RESULTS: Both FTVI and FTVII fucosylated CB CD34⁺ cells in vitro, and both led to enhanced rates and magnitudes of engraftment compared with untreated CB CD34⁺ cells in vivo. Engraftment after treatment with either FT was robust at multiple time points and in multiple tissues with similar multi-lineage potential. In contrast, only FTVII was able to fucosylate T and B lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Although FTVI and FTVII were found to be similarly able to fucosylate and enhance the engraftment of CB CD34⁺ cells, differences in their ability to fucosylate lymphocytes may modulate graft-versus-tumor or graft-versus-host effects and may allow further optimization of CB transplantation.
BACKGROUND AIMS: Advantages associated with the use of cord blood (CB) transplantation include the availability of cryopreserved units, ethnic diversity and lower incidence of graft-versus-host disease compared with bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood. However, poor engraftment remains a major obstacle. We and others have found that ex vivo fucosylation can enhance engraftment in murine models, and now ex vivo treatment of CB with fucosyltransferase (FT) VI before transplantation is under clinical evaluation (NCT01471067). However, FTVII appears to be more relevant to hematopoietic cells and may alter acceptor substrate diversity. The present study compared the ability of FTVI and FTVII to improve the rapidity, magnitude, multi-lineage and multi-tissue engraftment of human CB hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in vivo. METHODS:CD34-selected CB HSPCs were treated with recombinant FTVI, FTVII or mock control and then injected into immunodeficientmice and monitored for multi-lineage and multi-tissue engraftment. RESULTS: Both FTVI and FTVII fucosylated CB CD34⁺ cells in vitro, and both led to enhanced rates and magnitudes of engraftment compared with untreated CB CD34⁺ cells in vivo. Engraftment after treatment with either FT was robust at multiple time points and in multiple tissues with similar multi-lineage potential. In contrast, only FTVII was able to fucosylate T and B lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Although FTVI and FTVII were found to be similarly able to fucosylate and enhance the engraftment of CB CD34⁺ cells, differences in their ability to fucosylate lymphocytes may modulate graft-versus-tumor or graft-versus-host effects and may allow further optimization of CB transplantation.
Authors: Simon N Robinson; Paul J Simmons; Michael W Thomas; Nathalie Brouard; Jeannie A Javni; Suprita Trilok; Jae-Seung Shim; Hong Yang; David Steiner; William K Decker; Dongxia Xing; Leonard D Shultz; Barbara Savoldo; Gianpietro Dotti; Catherine M Bollard; Leonard Miller; Richard E Champlin; Elizabeth J Shpall; Patrick A Zweidler-McKay Journal: Exp Hematol Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: J D Kieffer; R C Fuhlbrigge; D Armerding; C Robert; K Ferenczi; R T Camphausen; T S Kupper Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2001-07-20 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Robert C Fuhlbrigge; Sandra L King; Charles J Dimitroff; Thomas S Kupper; Robert Sackstein Journal: J Immunol Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Yoshio Katayama; Andrés Hidalgo; Barbara C Furie; Dietmar Vestweber; Bruce Furie; Paul S Frenette Journal: Blood Date: 2003-05-22 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jungmin Lee; Brad Dykstra; Joel A Spencer; Laurie L Kenney; Dale L Greiner; Leonard D Shultz; Michael A Brehm; Charles P Lin; Robert Sackstein; Derrick J Rossi Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ema Prenc; Drazen Pulanic; Maja Pucic-Bakovic; Marija Pezer; Lana Desnica; Radovan Vrhovac; Damir Nemet; Steven Z Pavletic Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Simrit Parmar; Xiaoying Liu; Amer Najjar; Nina Shah; Hong Yang; Eric Yvon; Katy Rezvani; Ian McNiece; Patrick Zweidler-McKay; Leonard Miller; Steve Wolpe; Bruce R Blazar; Elizabeth J Shpall Journal: Blood Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Na Qiao; Mao Zhang; Gheath Alatrash; Madhushree Zope; Alexander A Perakis; Pariya Sukhumalchandra; Anne V Philips; Haven R Garber; Celine Kerros; Lisa S St John; Maria R Khouri; Hiep Khong; Karen Clise-Dwyer; Leonard P Miller; Steve Wolpe; Willem W Overwijk; Jeffrey J Molldrem; Qing Ma; Elizabeth J Shpall; Elizabeth A Mittendorf Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531