Literature DB >> 24094313

Comparison of ReaxFF, DFTB, and DFT for phenolic pyrolysis. 1. Molecular dynamics simulations.

Tingting Qi1, Charles W Bauschlicher, John W Lawson, Tapan G Desai, Evan J Reed.   

Abstract

A systematic comparison of atomistic modeling methods including density functional theory (DFT), the self-consistent charge density-functional tight-binding (SCC-DFTB), and ReaxFF is presented for simulating the initial stages of phenolic polymer pyrolysis. A phenolic polymer system is simulated for several hundred picoseconds within a temperature range of 2500 to 3500 K. The time evolution of major pyrolysis products including small-molecule species and char is examined. Two temperature zones are observed which demark cross-linking versus fragmentation. The dominant chemical products for all methods are similar, but the yields for each product differ. At 3500 K, DFTB overestimates CO production (300-400%) and underestimates free H (~30%) and small C(m)H(n)O molecules (~70%) compared with DFT. At 3500 K, ReaxFF underestimates free H (~60%) and fused carbon rings (~70%) relative to DFT. Heterocyclic oxygen-containing five- and six-membered carbon rings are observed at 2500 K. Formation mechanisms for H2O, CO, and char are discussed. Additional calculations using a semiclassical method for incorporating quantum nuclear energies of molecules were also performed. These results suggest that chemical equilibrium can be affected by quantum nuclear effects at temperatures of 2500 K and below. Pyrolysis reaction mechanisms and energetics are examined in detail in a companion manuscript.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094313     DOI: 10.1021/jp4081096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem A        ISSN: 1089-5639            Impact factor:   2.781


  2 in total

1.  Investigation on the Gas-phase decomposition of trichlorfon by GC-MS and theoretical calculation.

Authors:  Kezhi Jiang; Ningwen Zhang; Hu Zhang; Jianmei Wang; Mingrong Qian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Direct observation of realistic-temperature fuel combustion mechanisms in atomistic simulations.

Authors:  Kristof M Bal; Erik C Neyts
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.825

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.