Literature DB >> 24094055

Strategies and future trends to identify the mode of action of phytotoxic compounds.

Stefan Tresch1.   

Abstract

Small molecules affecting plant processes have been widely used as probes to study basic physiology. In agricultural practices some of these molecules have served as herbicides or plant growth regulators. Historically, most of the compounds were identified in large screens by the agrochemical industry, but also as phytoactive natural products. More recently, novel phytoactive compounds originated from academic research by chemical screens performed to induce specific phenotypes of interest. In the present review different approaches were evaluated for the identification of the mode of action (MoA) of phytoactive compounds. Based on the methodologies used for MoA identification, three approaches are differentiated: a phenotyping approach, an approach based on a genetic screen and a biochemical screening approach. Target sites of compounds targeting primary or secondary metabolism were identified most successfully with a phenotyping approach. Target sites for compounds that influence cell structure, such as cell wall biosynthesis or the cytoskeleton, or compounds that interact with the hormone system, were in most cases discovered by using a genetic approach. Examples showing the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches are discussed in detail. Additionally, new techniques that could contribute to future MoA identification projects are reviewed. In particular, next-generation sequencing techniques may be used for the fast-forward mapping of mutants identified in genetic screens. Finally, a revised three-tiered approach for the MoA identification of phytoactive compounds is proposed. The approach consists of a 1st tier, which addresses compound stability, uniformity of effects in different species, general cytotoxicity and the effect on common processes such as transcription and translation. Advanced studies based on these findings initiate the 2nd tier MoA characterization, either with further phenotypic characterization, starting a genetic screen or establishing a biochemical screen. At the 3rd tier, enzyme assays or protein affinity studies should show the activity of the compound on the hypothesized target and should associate the in vitro effects with the in vivo profile of the compound.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical genetics; Herbicide; Mechanism of action; Mode of action; Phytotoxic compound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094055     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  4 in total

Review 1.  Plant Chemical Genetics: From Phenotype-Based Screens to Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Wim Dejonghe; Eugenia Russinova
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Herbicides as weed control agents: state of the art: I. Weed control research and safener technology: the path to modern agriculture.

Authors:  Hansjoerg Kraehmer; Bernd Laber; Chris Rosinger; Arno Schulz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Novel Approach for High-Throughput Metabolic Screening of Whole Plants by Stable Isotopes.

Authors:  Lisa Maria Dersch; Veronique Beckers; Detlev Rasch; Guido Melzer; Christoph Bolten; Katina Kiep; Horst Becker; Oliver Ernst Bläsing; Regine Fuchs; Thomas Ehrhardt; Christoph Wittmann
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Target identification strategies in plant chemical biology.

Authors:  Wim Dejonghe; Eugenia Russinova
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.