BACKGROUND: Although documentation of children's pain by health care professionals is frequently undertaken, few studies have explored the nature of the language used to describe pain in the medical records of hospitalized children. OBJECTIVES: To describe health care professionals' use of written language related to the quality and quantity of pain experienced by hospitalized children. METHODS: Free-text pain narratives documented during a 24 h period were collected from the medical records of 3822 children (0 to 18 years of age) hospitalized on 32 inpatient units in eight Canadian pediatric hospitals. A qualitative descriptive exploration using a content analysis approach was used. RESULTS: Pain narratives were documented a total of 5390 times in 1518 of the 3822 children's medical records (40%). Overall, word choices represented objective and subjective descriptors. Two major categories were identified, with their respective subcategories of word indicators and associated cues: indicators of pain, including behavioural (e.g., vocal, motor, facial and activities cues), affective and physiological cues, and children's descriptors; and word qualifiers, including intensity, comparator and temporal qualifiers. CONCLUSIONS: The richness and complexity of vocabulary used by clinicians to document children's pain lend support to the concept that the word 'pain' is a label that represents a myriad of different experiences. There is potential to refine pediatric pain assessment measures to be inclusive of other cues used to identify children's pain. The results enhance the discussion concerning the development of standardized nomenclature. Further research is warranted to determine whether there is congruence in interpretation across time, place and individuals.
BACKGROUND: Although documentation of children's pain by health care professionals is frequently undertaken, few studies have explored the nature of the language used to describe pain in the medical records of hospitalized children. OBJECTIVES: To describe health care professionals' use of written language related to the quality and quantity of pain experienced by hospitalized children. METHODS: Free-text pain narratives documented during a 24 h period were collected from the medical records of 3822 children (0 to 18 years of age) hospitalized on 32 inpatient units in eight Canadian pediatric hospitals. A qualitative descriptive exploration using a content analysis approach was used. RESULTS:Pain narratives were documented a total of 5390 times in 1518 of the 3822 children's medical records (40%). Overall, word choices represented objective and subjective descriptors. Two major categories were identified, with their respective subcategories of word indicators and associated cues: indicators of pain, including behavioural (e.g., vocal, motor, facial and activities cues), affective and physiological cues, and children's descriptors; and word qualifiers, including intensity, comparator and temporal qualifiers. CONCLUSIONS: The richness and complexity of vocabulary used by clinicians to document children's pain lend support to the concept that the word 'pain' is a label that represents a myriad of different experiences. There is potential to refine pediatric pain assessment measures to be inclusive of other cues used to identify children's pain. The results enhance the discussion concerning the development of standardized nomenclature. Further research is warranted to determine whether there is congruence in interpretation across time, place and individuals.
Authors: Maureen R Keefe; Gail A Barbosa; Ann Froese-Fretz; Anne Marie Kotzer; Marie Lobo Journal: MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.412
Authors: Bonnie Stevens; Patrick McGrath; Janet Yamada; Sharyn Gibbins; Joseph Beyene; Lynn Breau; Carol Camfield; Allen Finley; Linda Franck; Alexandra Howlett; Celeste Johnston; Patricia McKeever; Karel O'Brien; Arne Ohlsson Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2006-02-02 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Linda Jm Oostendorp; Dilini Rajapakse; Paula Kelly; Joanna Crocker; Andrew Dinsdale; Lorna Fraser; Myra Bluebond-Langner Journal: J Child Health Care Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 1.979