OBJECTIVES: To report an outbreak due to an unusual strain of Enterococcus faecium containing both the vanA and vanB genes, in France, where the rate of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) is below 1%. METHODS: Cases were patients infected or colonized with GRE on the haematology ward. Contact patients were screened by real-time PCR performed on rectal swabs. Clinical features were compared for GRE-positive and GRE-negative patients. GRE isolates were characterized by phenotypic and molecular methods including PFGE. Conjugation experiments were performed to identify van genetic support. RESULTS: After the index patient presented a bacteraemia with vanA/vanB E. faecium, 56 contact patients were screened, 7 of whom were found to be GRE positive: 6 additional cases with vanA/vanB E. faecium and 1 with GRE carrying vanA only. PFGE confirmed the clonal relationship of the seven vanA/vanB E. faecium strains, whereas the vanA isolate was distinct. Only the vanA gene could be transferred to enterococcal recipients by conjugation, and it was probably localized on a mobile genetic element. All isolates were resistant to vancomycin (MIC > 256 mg/L) and teicoplanin (MIC = 24-32 mg/L), but were susceptible to tigecycline (MIC = 0.09 mg/L), linezolid (MIC = 0.75 mg/L) and daptomycin (MIC = 1-2 mg/L). Significant differences (P < 0.001) between carriers and non-carriers of GRE were observed for the median duration of hospitalization (57 days versus 16.5 days) and of neutropenia (40 days versus 6 days), the median number of antibiotics used (5 versus 1.5) and the duration of glycopeptide treatment (14.5 days versus 0 days). CONCLUSIONS: vanA/vanB E. faecium strains, although rare, can emerge in the absence of previous outbreaks of vanA-GRE or vanB-GRE.
OBJECTIVES: To report an outbreak due to an unusual strain of Enterococcus faecium containing both the vanA and vanB genes, in France, where the rate of glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (GRE) is below 1%. METHODS: Cases were patientsinfected or colonized with GRE on the haematology ward. Contact patients were screened by real-time PCR performed on rectal swabs. Clinical features were compared for GRE-positive and GRE-negative patients. GRE isolates were characterized by phenotypic and molecular methods including PFGE. Conjugation experiments were performed to identify van genetic support. RESULTS: After the index patient presented a bacteraemia with vanA/vanBE. faecium, 56 contact patients were screened, 7 of whom were found to be GRE positive: 6 additional cases with vanA/vanBE. faecium and 1 with GRE carrying vanA only. PFGE confirmed the clonal relationship of the seven vanA/vanBE. faecium strains, whereas the vanA isolate was distinct. Only the vanA gene could be transferred to enterococcal recipients by conjugation, and it was probably localized on a mobile genetic element. All isolates were resistant to vancomycin (MIC > 256 mg/L) and teicoplanin (MIC = 24-32 mg/L), but were susceptible to tigecycline (MIC = 0.09 mg/L), linezolid (MIC = 0.75 mg/L) and daptomycin (MIC = 1-2 mg/L). Significant differences (P < 0.001) between carriers and non-carriers of GRE were observed for the median duration of hospitalization (57 days versus 16.5 days) and of neutropenia (40 days versus 6 days), the median number of antibiotics used (5 versus 1.5) and the duration of glycopeptide treatment (14.5 days versus 0 days). CONCLUSIONS:vanA/vanBE. faecium strains, although rare, can emerge in the absence of previous outbreaks of vanA-GRE or vanB-GRE.