Literature DB >> 24091985

Risk factors for acetabular retroversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip: does the Pemberton osteotomy contribute?

Mio Akiyama1, Yasuharu Nakashima, Masanobu Oishi, Taishi Sato, Masanobu Hirata, Daisuke Hara, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate residual acetabular retroversion after skeletal maturity in patients with Pemberton osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 40 hips in 36 patients treated with a Pemberton osteotomy (Pemberton group) and 30 hips in 26 patients treated only with a Pavlik harness (Rb group) for developmental dysplasia of the hip. The average age at operation in the Pemberton group was 94.5 months and the follow-up duration was 151.8 months. Radiographic parameters included the acetabular index (α angle) and the center-edge angle of Wiberg, preoperatively and at skeletal maturity. We examined the crossover sign (COS) at the latest follow-up as a sign of acetabular retroversion (AR). We compared the parameters between the two groups and examined the risk factors for acetabular retroversion using a multivariate Cox model. RESULT: A COS (+) was significantly more frequent in the Pemberton group compared to the Rb group [15 hips (37.5%) vs 3 hips (10%); p = 0.0077]. In the Pemberton group, the average age at operation in COS (+) hips was significantly older than that in COS (-) hips (126.9 vs 72.8 months; p = 0.0005). The preoperative α angle did not vary between hips with and without COS; however, the postoperative α angle was significantly smaller in COS (+) hips. A multiple logistic regression analysis for prediction of COS (+) showed that the age at operation and the amount change of α angle were significant predictors for COS (+) hips. The cut-off of the age at operation was 7 years and 9 months old.
CONCLUSIONS: AR was present in 37.5% of the hips in the Pemberton group after skeletal maturity. Remodeling of acetabular version was observed in younger patients; however, hips in older patients (>8 years) at the time of operation and greater degrees of correction tended to result in AR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24091985     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-013-0473-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  5 in total

1.  Does Salter innominate osteotomy predispose the patient to acetabular retroversion in adulthood?

Authors:  Daisuke Kobayashi; Shinichi Satsuma; Maki Kinugasa; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Correction of the acetabular index is more crucial than the type of acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia.

Authors:  Nabil Alassaf
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Comparing the Pemberton osteotomy and modified San Diego acetabuloplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  R Badrinath; J D Bomar; D R Wenger; S J Mubarak; V V Upasani
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  3D Characterization of Acetabular Deficiency in Children with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Raghav Badrinath; Megan E Jeffords; James D Bomar; S Imraan Ahmed; Andrew T Pennock; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  MRI-based assessment of acetabular version and coverage after previous Pemberton osteotomy in skeletally mature patients.

Authors:  Petri Bellova; Sophia Blum; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Klaus-Peter Günther; Jens Goronzy
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.