BACKGROUND: Timeliness of care is an important dimension of health care quality. The determining factors of less timely care and their influence on the survival of patients with lung cancer (LC) remain uncertain. AIMS: To analyse the delays in the diagnosis and treatment of LC in our health area, the factors associated with the timeliness of care and their possible relationship with the survival of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients with a cytohistologically confirmed diagnosis of LC between 1 June 2005 and 31 May 2008. The time delays for consultation (specialist delay), diagnosis (diagnosis delay), and treatment (treatment delay), were analysed, as well as the factors associated with these delays and the influence of the timeliness of care on survival. RESULTS: A total of 307 cases were included (87 % males). The mean specialist delay was 53.6 days (median 35 days), diagnosis delay 31.5 days (median 18 days), treatment delay 23.5 days (median 14 days). The greater age of the patient and a more advanced stage were associated with a shorter specialist delay. Male sex, a more advanced stage, and poor general status were associated with a shorter treatment delay. The survival is longer in patients with a longer treatment delay. CONCLUSIONS: The delay in the diagnosis in our population seems to be excessively long. The greater the age, a more advanced tumour stage, male sex, and poor general health status are associated with shorter delays. A longer treatment delay is associated with a longer survival.
BACKGROUND: Timeliness of care is an important dimension of health care quality. The determining factors of less timely care and their influence on the survival of patients with lung cancer (LC) remain uncertain. AIMS: To analyse the delays in the diagnosis and treatment of LC in our health area, the factors associated with the timeliness of care and their possible relationship with the survival of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients with a cytohistologically confirmed diagnosis of LC between 1 June 2005 and 31 May 2008. The time delays for consultation (specialist delay), diagnosis (diagnosis delay), and treatment (treatment delay), were analysed, as well as the factors associated with these delays and the influence of the timeliness of care on survival. RESULTS: A total of 307 cases were included (87 % males). The mean specialist delay was 53.6 days (median 35 days), diagnosis delay 31.5 days (median 18 days), treatment delay 23.5 days (median 14 days). The greater age of the patient and a more advanced stage were associated with a shorter specialist delay. Male sex, a more advanced stage, and poor general status were associated with a shorter treatment delay. The survival is longer in patients with a longer treatment delay. CONCLUSIONS: The delay in the diagnosis in our population seems to be excessively long. The greater the age, a more advanced tumour stage, male sex, and poor general health status are associated with shorter delays. A longer treatment delay is associated with a longer survival.
Authors: Dorothy S Lo; Robert A Zeldin; Roland Skrastins; Ian M Fraser; Harold Newman; Alan Monavvari; Yee C Ung; Harry Joseph; Teresa Downton; Larissa Maxwell; Jacinta Meharchand Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Pepijn Brocken; Berni A B Kiers; Monika G Looijen-Salamon; P N Richard Dekhuijzen; Chantal Smits-van der Graaf; Liesbeth Peters-Bax; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Henricus F M van der Heijden Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: G Kasymjanova; D Small; V Cohen; R T Jagoe; G Batist; W Sateren; P Ernst; C Pepe; L Sakr; J Agulnik Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Amelia W Maiga; Stephen A Deppen; Rhonda Pinkerman; Carol Callaway-Lane; Pierre P Massion; Robert S Dittus; Eric S Lambright; Jonathan C Nesbitt; David Baker; Eric L Grogan Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Momen M Wahidi; Samira Shojaee; Carla R Lamb; David Ost; Fabien Maldonado; George Eapen; Daniel A Caroff; Michael P Stevens; Daniel R Ouellette; Craig Lilly; Donna D Gardner; Kristen Glisinski; Kelly Pennington; Raed Alalawi Journal: Chest Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Helen Hall; Adam Tocock; Sarah Burdett; David Fisher; William M Ricketts; John Robson; Thomas Round; Sarita Gorolay; Emma MacArthur; Donna Chung; Sam M Janes; Michael D Peake; Neal Navani Journal: Thorax Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 9.102