BACKROUND AND PURPOSE: Shoulder apprehension is defined as anxiety and resistance in patients with a history of anterior glenohumeral instability. It remains unclear whether shoulder apprehension is the result of true recurrent instability or a memorized subjective sensation. We tested whether visual presentation of apprehension videos modifies functional brain networks associated with motor resistance and anxiety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study includes 15 consecutive right-handed male patients with shoulder apprehension (9 with right shoulder apprehension, 6 with left shoulder apprehension; 27.5 ± 6.4 years) and 10 healthy male right-handed age-matched control participants (29.0 ± 4.7 years). Multimodal MR imaging included 1) functional connectivity tensorial independent component analysis, 2) task-related general linear model analysis during visual stimulation of movies showing typical apprehension movements vs control videos, 3) voxel-based morphometry analysis of GM, and 4) tract-based spatial statistics analysis of WM. RESULTS: Patients with shoulder apprehension had significant (P < .05 corrected) increase in task-correlated functional connectivity, notably in the bilateral primary sensory-motor area and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and, to a lesser degree, the bilateral dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (+148% right, +144% left). Anticorrelated functional connectivity decreased in the higher-level visual and parietal areas (-185%). There were no potentially confounding structural changes in GM or WM. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder apprehension induces specific reorganization in apprehension-related functional connectivity of the primary sensory-motor areas (motor resistance), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (cognitive control of motor behavior), and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula (anxiety and emotional regulation).
BACKROUND AND PURPOSE: Shoulder apprehension is defined as anxiety and resistance in patients with a history of anterior glenohumeral instability. It remains unclear whether shoulder apprehension is the result of true recurrent instability or a memorized subjective sensation. We tested whether visual presentation of apprehension videos modifies functional brain networks associated with motor resistance and anxiety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study includes 15 consecutive right-handed male patients with shoulder apprehension (9 with right shoulder apprehension, 6 with left shoulder apprehension; 27.5 ± 6.4 years) and 10 healthy male right-handed age-matched control participants (29.0 ± 4.7 years). Multimodal MR imaging included 1) functional connectivity tensorial independent component analysis, 2) task-related general linear model analysis during visual stimulation of movies showing typical apprehension movements vs control videos, 3) voxel-based morphometry analysis of GM, and 4) tract-based spatial statistics analysis of WM. RESULTS: Patients with shoulder apprehension had significant (P < .05 corrected) increase in task-correlated functional connectivity, notably in the bilateral primary sensory-motor area and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and, to a lesser degree, the bilateral dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (+148% right, +144% left). Anticorrelated functional connectivity decreased in the higher-level visual and parietal areas (-185%). There were no potentially confounding structural changes in GM or WM. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder apprehension induces specific reorganization in apprehension-related functional connectivity of the primary sensory-motor areas (motor resistance), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (cognitive control of motor behavior), and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and anterior insula (anxiety and emotional regulation).
Authors: Mark W Woolrich; Timothy E J Behrens; Christian F Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: J S Damoiseaux; S A R B Rombouts; F Barkhof; P Scheltens; C J Stam; S M Smith; C F Beckmann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Danielle S Bassett; Nicholas F Wymbs; Mason A Porter; Peter J Mucha; Jean M Carlson; Scott T Grafton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sven Haller; Rotem Kopel; Permi Jhooti; Tanja Haas; Frank Scharnowski; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Klaus Scheffler; Dimitri Van De Ville Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Daniel Rueckert; Thomas E Nichols; Clare E Mackay; Kate E Watkins; Olga Ciccarelli; M Zaheer Cader; Paul M Matthews; Timothy E J Behrens Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Adrian Wolfensberger; Philippe Vuistiner; Michel Konzelmann; Chantal Plomb-Holmes; Bertrand Léger; François Luthi Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 4.176