| Literature DB >> 24091177 |
F Ceci, S Orsini, A Tudisco, M Avallone, F Aiuti, V Di Girolamo, F Stefanelli, F De Angelis, A Martellucci, A Costantino, C Di Grazia, S Nicodemi, B Cipriani, A Napoleoni, R Mosillo, S Corelli, G Casciaro, E Spaziani, F Stagnitti.
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated the clinical and technical benefits of the laparoscopic surgery for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Our retrospective study included 12 patient who underwent SILS appendectomy (SILS-A), 14 who received conventional laparoscopic surgery (VL-A), and 12 who received laparotomic appendectomy (OA); performed in all cases by the same surgeon (C.F.). The aim of this study was the comparison between this three different surgical techniques on same features: post operative leukocytosis, post operative pain, need abdominal drainage, esthetic viewpoint, incidence of complication, hospital stay. The results showed no significant differences between SILS-A and VLS-A, while an evident improvement shows versus O-A, even though not statistically significative. SILS was more effective in decreasing the risk of postoperative wound infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24091177 PMCID: PMC3915604 DOI: 10.11138/gchir/2013.34.7.216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G Chir ISSN: 0391-9005