Literature DB >> 24090745

Association of cardiac events with coronary artery disease detected by 64-slice or greater coronary CT angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Phillip J Habib1, Jacinta Green, Ryan C Butterfield, Gretchen M Kuntz, Raguveer Murthy, Dale F Kraemer, Robert F Percy, Alan B Miller, Joel A Strom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of ≥64-slice coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to determine odds of cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) needs further clarification.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using publications reporting events/severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD undergoing CCTA. Patients were divided into: no CAD, non-obstructive CAD (maximal stenosis <50%), and obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis). Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a fixed or random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I(2) index.
RESULTS: We included thirty-two studies comprising 41,960 patients with 363 all-cause deaths (15.0%), 114 cardiac deaths (4.7%), 342 MI (14.2%), 69 unstable angina (2.8%), and 1527 late revascularizations (63.2%) over 1.96 (SD 0.77) years of follow-up. Cardiac death or MI occurred in 0.04% without, 1.29% with non-obstructive, and 6.53% with obstructive CAD. OR for cardiac death or MI was: 14.92 (95% CI, 6.78 to 32.85) for obstructive CAD, 6.41 (95% CI, 2.44 to 16.84) for non-obstructive CAD versus no CAD, and 3.19 (95% CI, 2.29 to 4.45) for non-obstructive versus obstructive CAD and 6.56 (95% CI, 3.07 to 14.02) for no versus any CAD. Similar trends were noted for all-cause mortality and composite major adverse cardiovascular events.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing CAD severity detected by CCTA is associated with cardiac death or MI, all-cause mortality, and composite major adverse cardiovascular events. Absence of CAD is associated with very low odds of major adverse events, but non-obstructive disease significantly increases odds of cardiac adverse events in this follow-up period.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD; CCTA; CHD; Cardiovascular events; Coronary CT angiography; Coronary artery disease; MACE; MI; Meta-analysis; SPECT; coronary CT angiography; coronary artery disease; coronary heart disease; major adverse cardiovascular events; myocardial infarction; single-photon emission computed tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24090745     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  16 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography coronary angiography - past, present and future.

Authors:  Pei Ing Ngam; Ching Ching Ong; Ping Chai; Siong Sung Wong; Chong Ri Liang; Lynette Li San Teo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Prognostic Value of Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Nuclear Stress Perfusion Imaging in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CORE320 Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Marcus Y Chen; Carlos E Rochitte; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Marc Dewey; Richard T George; Julie M Miller; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Kunihiro Yoshioka; Kakuya Kitagawa; Hajime Sakuma; Roger Laham; Andrea L Vavere; Rodrigo J Cerci; Vishal C Mehra; Cesar Nomura; Klaus F Kofoed; Masahiro Jinzaki; Sachio Kuribayashi; Arthur J Scholte; Michael Laule; Swee Yaw Tan; John Hoe; Narinder Paul; Frank J Rybicki; Jeffrey A Brinker; Andrew E Arai; Matthew B Matheson; Christopher Cox; Melvin E Clouse; Marcelo F Di Carli; João A C Lima
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on the Prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Angiographically Normal Coronary Arteries.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Lutz Klinghammer; Mohamed Marwan; Jasmin Schmid; Christian Layritz; Udo Hoffmann; Stephan Achenbach; Tobias Pflederer
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  CT as gatekeeper of invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected CAD.

Authors:  Carlos A G Van Mieghem
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

5.  Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspective from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: PROMISE.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Maros Ferencik; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Outcomes of anatomical vs. functional testing for coronary artery disease : Lessons from the PROMISE trial.

Authors:  R Shah; B Foldyna; U Hoffmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Cardiac CT vs. Stress Testing in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Review and Expert Recommendations.

Authors:  Amir Ali Rahsepar; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015-06-17

8.  The characteristics of coronary stenosis in 11,267 patients from Southwest China: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhao Yin; Chunyu Zeng; Xiaoqun Zhang; Chengming Yang; Hongyong Wang; Wenxing Song; Xu Wang; Chunjiang Fu; Weibin Shi; Yuqiang Fang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Epicardial adipose tissue reflects the presence of coronary artery disease: comparison with abdominal visceral adipose tissue.

Authors:  Masayoshi Oikawa; Takashi Owada; Hiroyuki Yamauchi; Tomofumi Misaka; Hirofumi Machii; Takayoshi Yamaki; Koichi Sugimoto; Hiroyuki Kunii; Kazuhiko Nakazato; Hitoshi Suzuki; Shu-ichi Saitoh; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Independent prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary computed tomography angiography in an outpatient cohort of low to intermediate risk chest pain patients.

Authors:  M J Bom; P M Van der Zee; F M Van der Zant; R J J Knol; J H Cornel
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.