| Literature DB >> 24090086 |
Walid Refaai1, Richard Ducatelle, Peter Geldhof, Belgacem Mihi, Mahasen El-shair, Geert Opsomer.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Digital Dermatitis (DD) is a common disease of dairy cows, the pathogenesis of which is still not clear. This study examined some host responses associated with the typical lesions, in an attempt to further elucidate the pathogenesis of the disease. Twenty four samples representing the 5 different clinical stages of DD (M0-M4) were collected from slaughtered cattle for histopathological and immunological analyses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24090086 PMCID: PMC3851557 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Figure 1HE staining of the digital skin affected by a digital dermatitis lesion (M4). Thickening of the epidermal layer and elongation of rete ridges (A) and infiltration of eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes in the dermis at the junction with the epidermis (B).
Genes used in qRT-PCR work, referring to the GeneBank accession number and primer sequences
| CCR3 | F: TGTGTCAACCCCGTGATCTA | NM_001194960.1 | 60 |
| | R: AGAGTTCCTGCTCCCCTGTT | | |
| IL1β | F: AAGGCTCTCCACCTCCTCTC | NM_174093.1 | 60 |
| | R: TTTGGGGTCTACTTCCTCCA | | |
| IL4 | F: GCGGACTTGACAGGAATCTC | NM_173921.2 | 64 |
| | R: TCAGCGTACTTGTGCTCGTC | | |
| IL5 | F: TGGTGGCAGAGACCTTGACA | NM_173922.1 | 60 |
| | R: TTCCCATCACCTATCAGCAGAGT | | |
| IL6 | F: TCCTTGCTGCTTTCACACTC | NM_173923.2 | 60 |
| | R: CACCCCAGGCAGACTACTTC | | |
| IL8 | F: GTTGCTCTCTTGGCAGCTTT | NM_173925.2 | 60 |
| | R: GGTGGAAAGGTGTGGAATGT | | |
| IL10 | F: TGTATCCACTTGCCAACCAG | NM_174088.1 | 60 |
| | R: CAGCAGAGACTGGGTCAACA | | |
| IL13 | F: GGTGGCCTCACCTCCCCAAG | NM_174089.1 | 60 |
| | R: GATGACACTGCAGTTGGAGATGCTG | | |
| IL17 | F: GGACTCTCCACCGCAATGAG | NM_001008412.1 | 60 |
| | R: TGGCCTCCCAGATCACAGA | | |
| IFNϒ | F: TTCTTGAATGGCAGCTCTGA | NM_174086.1 | 60 |
| | R: TTCTCTTCGGCTTTCTGAGG | | |
| TGFβ | F: CTGCTGTGTTCGTCAGCTCT | NM_001166068.1 | 60 |
| | R: TCCAGGCTCCAGATGTAAGG | | |
| TNFA | F: GCCCTCTGGTTCAGACACTC | NM_173966.2 | 60 |
| | R: AGATGAGGTAAAGCCCGTCA | | |
| GAPDH | F: GGGTCATCATCTCTGCACCT | NM_001034034.1 | 60 |
| | R: GGTCATAAGTCCCTCCACGA | | |
| RPLP0 | F: CTTCATTGTGGGAGCAGACA | NM_001012682.1 | 60 |
| R: GGCAACAGTTTCTCCAGAGC |
F: forward primer.
R: reverse primer.
Ta: annealing temperature.
Figure 2One Way Anova test used to statistically represent the measurements of the total epidermal and keratin layer thickness, length of rete ridges, and the number of neutrophils infiltrated in the dermis adjacent to the epidermis in the normal compared to the diseased groups. Differences between groups with different letters are significant (P value < 0.05).
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining of digital dermatitis infected skin for detection of CD(+ve T-lymphocytes ) (A, M0) and CD(+ve B-lymphocytes) (B, M4). T and B lymphocytes were observed mainly in the dermis at the junction with the epidermis.
Transcription levels of different genes in digital dermatitis diseased groups (M1, M2, M3, M4) expressed as fold changes compared to the normal group (M0)
| CCR3 | 0.36±0.10 | 0.56±0.18 | 0.36±0.02* | 0.39±0.10* |
| IL1B | 4.9±2.5 | 52.3±21.6 | 37.3±14.9 | 2.7±1.4 |
| IL4 | 0.42±0.19 | 1.14±0.51 | 0.13±0.07 | 0.38±0.16 |
| IL5 | 0.42±0.08 | 0.44±0.10 | 0.30±0.07* | 0.40±0.06* |
| IL6 | 9.9±4.4 | 44.4±23.6 | 37.2±19.0 | 2.8±1.4 |
| IL8 | 42.8±33.3 | 328.0±144.4* | 190.7±112.7* | 10.8±4.8* |
| IL10 | 1.60±0.45 | 2.9±0.7 | 1.8±0.5 | 1.02±0.17 |
| IL13 | 0.68±0.10 | 0.74±0.15 | 0.72±0.23 | 0.50±0.14* |
| IL17 | 2.34±0.96 | 4.80±2.57 | 1.55±0.76 | 1.52±0.74 |
| INFG | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| TGFB | 0.83±0.16 | 0.95±0.16 | 0.63±0.09 | 0.68±0.12 |
| TNFA | 0.61±0.18 | 1.36±0.34 | 1.35±0.39 | 1.01±0.15 |
ND: not expressed, too low in the sample.
Data was expressed as (Mean ± SE) of fold changes in diseased groups compared to normal group.
*p-value < 0.05 is considered significant in comparison to the normal (M0) group.
n: number of samples used per group.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical staining of digital skin for detection of IL8. Viable keratinocytes are the cells producing the IL8 cytokine. Both the stratum corneum and dermal papillae are not producing IL8 (A represents M0 and B represents M2).