Literature DB >> 24089010

Radial to femoral arterial blood pressure differences in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine therapy.

Won Young Kim1, Jong Hun Jun, Jin Won Huh, Sang Bum Hong, Chae-Man Lim, Younsuck Koh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of arterial blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is crucial in treating septic shock patients. Clinically significant differences in central to peripheral ABP could develop into sepsis during vasopressor therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference between radial (peripheral) and femoral (central) ABP in septic shock patients receiving high-dose norepinephrine (NE) therapy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This prospective observational study comparing simultaneous intra-arterial measurements of radial and femoral ABP was performed at a university-affiliated, tertiary referral center between October 2008 and March 2009. Patients with septic shock who needed continuous blood pressure monitoring and high-dose NE therapy 0.1 µg/kg per minute or greater to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg or greater were included. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Bland-Altman method for comparison of repeated measures. In total, 250 sets of systolic, mean, and diastolic femoral and radial ABP were recorded at baseline and after NE titration. Arterial blood pressure readings from the radial artery were underestimated compared with those from the femoral artery. Overall bias (mean difference between simultaneous measurements) between radial and femoral MAP was +4.9 mmHg; however, during high-dose NE therapy, the bias increased to +6.2 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -6.0 to +18.3 mmHg). Clinically significant radial-femoral MAP differences (MAP ≥5 mmHg) occurred in up to 62.2% of patients with high-dose NE therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Radial artery pressure frequently underestimates central pressure in septic shock patients receiving high-dose NE therapy. Femoral arterial pressure monitoring may be more appropriate when high-dose NE therapy is administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24089010     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  12 in total

1.  Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution.

Authors:  Matthew Lee; Laurence Weinberg; Brett Pearce; Nicholas Scurrah; David A Story; Param Pillai; Peter R McCall; Larry P McNicol; Philip J Peyton
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Arterial Catheterization and Infection: Toll-like Receptors in Defense against Microorganisms and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Zakary J Hambsch; Mitchell J Kerfeld; Daniel R Kirkpatrick; Dan M McEntire; Mark D Reisbig; Charles F Youngblood; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Comments on Cecconi et al.: consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Daniel Eduardo Agudelo Torres; Jose Navarro-Martinez; Maria Galiana-Ivars; Carmelo Alarcon Martinez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Non-invasive monitoring using photoplethysmography technology.

Authors:  Keisuke Tomita; Taka-Aki Nakada; Taku Oshima; Takehiko Oami; Tuerxun Aizimu; Shigeto Oda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Can we trust radial artery pressure monitoring for cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze; Adrian Costescu; André Denault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 6.  Cardiac Output Monitoring by Pulse Contour Analysis, the Technical Basics of Less-Invasive Techniques.

Authors:  Jörn Grensemann
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-03-06

7.  Peripheral arterial blood pressure versus central crterial blood pressure monitoring in critically ill patients after Cardio-pulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Rana Altaf Ahmad; Suhail Ahmad; Anjum Naveed; Mirza Ahmad Raza Baig
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Refractory septic shock: our pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Prashanth Nandhabalan; Nicholas Ioannou; Christopher Meadows; Duncan Wyncoll
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Modalities of Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Gwenaëlle Jacq; Karine Gritti; Cécile Carré; Nadège Fleury; Annie Lang; Josette Courau-Courtois; Jean-Pierre Bedos; Stephane Legriel
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Response to exercise-induced blood pressure elevation is blunted in wrist-cuff automated oscillometric measurement in healthy young college students.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sato; Nobutoshi Ichise; Yoshinori Terashima; Aoi Kato; Hiroya Yamazaki; Shunsuke Jimbo; Noritsugu Tohse
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.