Literature DB >> 24088774

The effect of radial head implant length on radiocapitellar articular properties and load transfer within the forearm.

Brent A Lanting1, Louis M Ferreira, James A Johnson, Graham J W King, George S Athwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of radial head implant length on forearm biomechanics is not well understood. This study examined the influence of an increase or a decrease in radial head implant length on forearm load transfer as measured by interosseous membrane (IOM) tension and changes in radiocapitellar joint contact properties.
METHODS: An upper extremity simulator was used to examine 6 cadaveric specimens with 5 different radial head implant lengths (-4 mm, -2 mm, anatomically correct, +2 mm, and +4 mm). A load-sensing device was woven into the fibers of IOM to quantify its tension. An interpositional pressure measurement sensor was used to determine radiocapitellar joint contact area and pressure. Axial loads of 160 N were applied to the forearm through active pronation and supination with the elbow fixed at 90 degrees of flexion.
RESULTS: Increasing radial head implant length by 4 mm unloaded the IOM in all cases. Decreasing implant length by 4 mm significantly increased the IOM tension (P = 0.005). No significant differences were found in IOM tension between the correct head implant length and the -2 mm implant (P = 0.29). Contact pressure significantly increased with increasing radial head implant length (P = 0.021) and contact area diminished with both an increase and a decrease in radial head implant length, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.051).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing radial head implant length decreased IOM tension and increased radiocapitellar joint contact pressure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings illustrate the importance of precise restoration of radial length when performing a radial head replacement. If the native radial head length is difficult to accurately assess, avoid increasing the length of the radial head to prevent detrimental changes in the biomechanics of the forearm and the potential for clinically important radiocapitellar joint pathology.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24088774     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  6 in total

1.  Disadvantages of having a shortening of the proximal radius.

Authors:  Nick F J Hilgersom; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Radial shortening osteotomy reduces radiocapitellar contact pressures while preserving valgus stability of the elbow.

Authors:  Michael Hackl; Kilian Wegmann; Stephanie L Kahmann; Nicolai Heinze; Manfred Staat; Wolfram F Neiss; Martin Scaal; Lars P Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effect of incremental increase in radial neck height on coronoid and capitellar contact pressures.

Authors:  Taghi Ramazanian; Julia A Müller-Lebschi; Min Yao Chuang; Anthony M Vaichinger; James S Fitzsimmons; Shawn W O'Driscoll
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-10-30

4.  Fracture Pattern Influences Radial Head Replacement Size Determination Among Experienced Elbow Surgeons.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Francesco Luceri; Andrea Celli; Alessandra Menon; Raul Barco; Kilian Wegmann; Pietro Randelli; Denise Eygendaal; Paolo Arrigoni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 5.  Biomechanical Concepts for Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Michael Bottlang; Christine E Schemitsch; Aaron Nauth; Milton Routt; Kenneth A Egol; Gillian E Cook; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Is the distal radioulnar variance useful for identification of radial head prosthesis overlengthening? A cadaver study.

Authors:  Kilian Wegmann; Wei Zhang; Volker Strauss; Christian Ries; Lars P Müller; Klaus J Burkhart
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.175

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.