Chelsea B Polis1, Daniel Westreich, Jennifer E Balkus, Renee Heffron. 1. aOffice of Population and Reproductive Health, United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC bDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill cDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina dVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center eDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. *Chelsea B. Polis, Daniel Westreich, Jennifer E. Balkus and Renee Heffron contributed equally to the writing of the article.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Determining whether hormonal contraception, particularly the injectable contraceptive depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), increases a woman's risk of HIV acquisition is a priority question for public health. However, assessing the relationship between various hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition with observational data involves substantial analytic design issues and challenges. Studies to date have used inconsistent approaches and generated a body of evidence that is complex and challenging to interpret. METHODS: In January 2013, the United States Agency for International Development and FHI 360 supported a meeting of epidemiologists, statisticians, and content experts to develop recommendations for future observational analyses of hormonal contraception and HIV acquisition. RESULTS: Meeting participants generated recommendations regarding careful definition of exposure groups; handling potential confounders, mediators, and effect modifiers; estimating and addressing the magnitude of measurement error; using multiple methods to account for pregnancy; and exploring the potential for differential exposure to HIV-infected partners. Advantages and disadvantages of various statistical approaches to account for time-varying confounding and estimating total and direct effects were also discussed. CONCLUSION: Implementing these recommendations in future observational hormonal contraception-HIV acquisition analyses will enhance interpretation of existing studies and strengthen the overall evidence base for this complex and important area.
INTRODUCTION: Determining whether hormonal contraception, particularly the injectable contraceptive depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), increases a woman's risk of HIV acquisition is a priority question for public health. However, assessing the relationship between various hormonal contraceptive methods and HIV acquisition with observational data involves substantial analytic design issues and challenges. Studies to date have used inconsistent approaches and generated a body of evidence that is complex and challenging to interpret. METHODS: In January 2013, the United States Agency for International Development and FHI 360 supported a meeting of epidemiologists, statisticians, and content experts to develop recommendations for future observational analyses of hormonal contraception and HIV acquisition. RESULTS: Meeting participants generated recommendations regarding careful definition of exposure groups; handling potential confounders, mediators, and effect modifiers; estimating and addressing the magnitude of measurement error; using multiple methods to account for pregnancy; and exploring the potential for differential exposure to HIV-infected partners. Advantages and disadvantages of various statistical approaches to account for time-varying confounding and estimating total and direct effects were also discussed. CONCLUSION: Implementing these recommendations in future observational hormonal contraception-HIV acquisition analyses will enhance interpretation of existing studies and strengthen the overall evidence base for this complex and important area.
Authors: N Chomont; G Grésenguet; M Lévy; H Hocini; P Becquart; M Matta; J Tranchot-Diallo; L Andreoletti; M P Carreno; M D Kazatchkine; L Bélec Journal: Clin Diagn Lab Immunol Date: 2001-09
Authors: Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins; Kathryn Anastos; Joan Chmiel; Roger Detels; Carolyn Ervin; Joseph Feldman; Ruth Greenblatt; Lawrence Kingsley; Shenghan Lai; Mary Young; Mardge Cohen; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Lee Warner; Daniel R Newman; Harland D Austin; Mary L Kamb; John M Douglas; C Kevin Malotte; Jonathan M Zenilman; Judy Rogers; Gail Bolan; Martin Fishbein; David G Kleinbaum; Maurizio Macaluso; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-02-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Maria Pyra; Jairam R Lingappa; Renee Heffron; David W Erikson; Steven W Blue; Rena C Patel; Kavita Nanda; Helen Rees; Nelly R Mugo; Nicole L Davis; Athena P Kourtis; Jared M Baeten Journal: Contraception Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Jennifer E Balkus; Elizabeth R Brown; Sharon L Hillier; Anne Coletti; Gita Ramjee; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Bonus Makanani; Cheri Reid; Francis Martinson; Lydia Soto-Torres; Salim S Abdool Karim; Zvavahera M Chirenje Journal: Contraception Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Christine M Bassis; Jenifer E Allsworth; Heather N Wahl; Daniel E Sack; Vincent B Young; Jason D Bell Journal: Contraception Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Jennifer E Balkus; Barbra A Richardson; Lorna K Rabe; Taha E Taha; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Margaret Phiri Kasaro; Gita Ramjee; Irving F Hoffman; Salim S Abdool Karim Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: M Eugenia Socías; Putu Duff; Jean Shoveller; Julio S G Montaner; Paul Nguyen; Gina Ogilvie; Kate Shannon Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Renee Heffron; Urvi M Parikh; Kerri J Penrose; Nelly Mugo; Deborah Donnell; Connie Celum; John W Mellors; Jared M Baeten Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-07
Authors: Lisa M Noguchi; Barbra A Richardson; Jared M Baeten; Sharon L Hillier; Jennifer E Balkus; Z Mike Chirenje; Katherine Bunge; Gita Ramjee; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Pearl Selepe; Ariane van der Straten; Urvi M Parikh; Kailazarid Gomez; Jeanna M Piper; D Heather Watts; Jeanne M Marrazzo Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 12.767