Literature DB >> 24088154

Key opinion leaders and the corruption of medical knowledge: what the Sunshine Act will and won't cast light on.

Sergio Sismondo1.   

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry, in its marketing efforts, often turns to "key opinion leaders" or "KOLs" to disseminate scientific information. Drawing on the author's fieldwork, this article documents and examines the use of KOLs in pharmaceutical companies' marketing efforts. Partly due to the use of KOLs, a small number of companies with well-defined and narrow interests have inordinate influence over how medical knowledge is produced, circulated, and consumed. The issue here, as in many other cases of institutional corruption, is that a few actors have accumulated the power to shape the information on which many others base their decisions. Efforts to address this corruption should focus on correcting large imbalances in the current political economy of medical knowledge. A sequestration of pharmaceutical research and development on one hand from pharmaceutical marketing on the other, though difficult to achieve, would address this and many other problems.
© 2013 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24088154     DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  23 in total

1.  Public Awareness of and Contact With Physicians Who Receive Industry Payments: A National Survey.

Authors:  Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Michelle M Mello; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Eric G Campbell; Daniel Carpenter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Industry Payments to Physicians for Opioid Products, 2013-2015.

Authors:  Scott E Hadland; Maxwell S Krieger; Brandon D L Marshall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Revisiting financial conflicts of interest in FDA advisory committees.

Authors:  Genevieve Pham-Kanter
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Scientism in Medical Education and the Improvement of Medical Care: Opioids, Competencies, and Social Accountability.

Authors:  Lynette Reid
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2018-06

5.  Association of Gender With Financial Relationships Between Industry and Academic Otolaryngologists.

Authors:  Jean Anderson Eloy; Michael Bobian; Peter F Svider; Ashley Culver; Bianca Siegel; Stacey T Gray; Soly Baredes; Sujana S Chandrasekhar; Adam J Folbe
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Patient advocacy organizations: institutional conflicts of interest, trust, and trustworthiness.

Authors:  Susannah L Rose
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Financial Conflicts of Interest of United States-Based Authors in Neurology Journals: Cross-Sectional Study Using the Open Payments Database.

Authors:  Jade E Smith; Charlotte Wahle; James L Bernat; Nathaniel M Robbins
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  A comparison of educational events for physicians and nurses in Australia sponsored by opioid manufacturers.

Authors:  Quinn Grundy; Sasha Mazzarello; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Emily A Karanges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Gender Disparity in Industry Relationships With Academic Interventional Radiology Physicians.

Authors:  Amy R Deipolyi; Anton S Becker; Anne M Covey; Susan C Chimonas; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Howard P Forman; William A Copen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.582

10.  The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing--strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics.

Authors:  Alastair Matheson
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.