Literature DB >> 24088149

Institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals and the myth of safe and effective drugs.

Donald W Light1, Joel Lexchin, Jonathan J Darrow.   

Abstract

Over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few offsetting benefits. The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created. Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA's prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients. Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate. We offer practical suggestions including: separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication; independent FDA leadership; full public funding for all FDA activities; measures to discourage R&D on drugs with few, if any, new clinical benefits; and the creation of a National Drug Safety Board.
© 2013 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24088149     DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  18 in total

1.  Gifts and influence: Conflict of interest policies and prescribing of psychotropic medications in the United States.

Authors:  Marissa King; Peter S Bearman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Peering into the pharmaceutical "pipeline": investigational drugs, clinical trials, and industry priorities.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Marci D Cottingham; Corey A Kalbaugh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Can the FDA Help Reduce Drug Prices or the Cost of Medical Care?

Authors:  Diana M Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Regulatory Capture in Pharmaceutical Policy Making: The Case of National Medicine Agencies Related to the EU Falsified Medicines Directive.

Authors:  Rasmus Borup; Janine Morgall Traulsen; Susanne Kaae
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-06

5.  Quaternary prevention, an answer of family doctors to overmedicalization.

Authors:  Marc Jamoulle
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-02-04

6.  The Prescription Drug User Fee Act: Much More Than User Fees.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell; Niti U Trivedi; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  How the Suboxone Education Programme presented as a solution to risks in the Canadian opioid crisis: a critical discourse analysis.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Sud; Matthew Strang; Daniel Z Buchman; Sheryl Spithoff; Ross E G Upshur; Fiona Webster; Quinn Grundy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Does Medical Expansion Improve Population Health?

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Linda K George
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Hospital physician payment mechanisms in Austria: do they provide gateways to institutional corruption?

Authors:  Margit Sommersguter-Reichmann; Adolf Stepan
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-03-01

10.  The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Canadian Government: Folie à Deux.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2017-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.