Literature DB >> 24087939

Spatiotemporal land use regression models of fine, ultrafine, and black carbon particulate matter in New Delhi, India.

Arvind Saraswat1, Joshua S Apte, Milind Kandlikar, Michael Brauer, Sarah B Henderson, Julian D Marshall.   

Abstract

Air pollution in New Delhi, India, is a significant environmental and health concern. To assess determinants of variability in air pollutant concentrations, we develop land use regression (LUR) models for fine particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), and ultrafine particle number concentrations (UFPN). We used 136 h (39 sites), 112 h (26 sites), 147 h (39 sites) of PM2.5, BC, and UFPN data respectively, to develop separate morning (0800-1200) and afternoon (1200-1800) models. Continuous measurements of PM2.5 and BC were also made at a single fixed rooftop site located in a high-income residential neighborhood. No continuous measurements of UFPN were available. In addition to spatial variables, measurements from the fixed continuous monitoring site were used as independent variables in the PM2.5 and BC models. The median concentrations (and interquartile range) of PM2.5, BC, and UFPN at LUR sites were 133 (96-232) μg m(-3), 11 (6-21) μg m(-3), and 40 (27-72) × 10(3) cm(-3) respectively. In addition (a) for PM2.5 and BC, the temporal variability was higher than the spatial variability; (b) the magnitude and spatial variability in pollutant concentrations was higher during morning than during afternoon hours. Further, model R(2) values were higher for morning (for PM2.5, BC, and UFPN, respectively: 0.85, 0.86, and 0.28) than for afternoon models (0.73, 0.69, and 0.23); (c) the PM2.5 and BC concentrations measured at LUR sites all over the city were strongly correlated with measured concentrations at a fixed rooftop site; (d) spatial patterns were similar for PM2.5 and BC but different for UFPN; (e) population density and road variables were statistically significant predictors of pollutant concentrations; and (f) available geographic predictors explained a much lower proportion of variability in measured PM2.5, BC, and UFPN than observed in other LUR studies, indicating the importance of temporal variability and suggesting the existence of uncharacterized sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24087939     DOI: 10.1021/es401489h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  15 in total

1.  Applying land use regression model to estimate spatial variation of PM₂.₅ in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Jiansheng Wu; Jiacheng Li; Jian Peng; Weifeng Li; Guang Xu; Chengcheng Dong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Air pollution and allergic diseases.

Authors:  Eric B Brandt; Jocelyn M Biagini Myers; Patrick H Ryan; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.856

3.  Assessment of the spatio-temporal pattern of PM2.5 and its driving factors using a land use regression model in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Lingqiang Kong; Guangjin Tian
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Source Characterization and Exposure Modeling of Gas-Phase Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Concentrations in Southern California.

Authors:  Shahir Masri; Lianfa Li; Andy Dang; Judith H Chung; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; Zhi-Hua Tina Fan; Jun Wu
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Characterization of Annual Average Traffic-Related Air Pollution Concentrations in the Greater Seattle Area from a Year-Long Mobile Monitoring Campaign.

Authors:  Magali N Blanco; Amanda Gassett; Timothy Gould; Annie Doubleday; David L Slager; Elena Austin; Edmund Seto; Timothy V Larson; Julian D Marshall; Lianne Sheppard
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 11.357

6.  Assessing the Suitability of Multiple Dispersion and Land Use Regression Models for Urban Traffic-Related Ultrafine Particles.

Authors:  Allison P Patton; Chad Milando; John L Durant; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Transferability and generalizability of regression models of ultrafine particles in urban neighborhoods in the Boston area.

Authors:  Allison P Patton; Wig Zamore; Elena N Naumova; Jonathan I Levy; Doug Brugge; John L Durant
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Air pollution, epigenetics, and asthma.

Authors:  Hong Ji; Jocelyn M Biagini Myers; Eric B Brandt; Cole Brokamp; Patrick H Ryan; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.406

9.  Land Use Regression Models for Ultrafine Particles in Six European Areas.

Authors:  Erik van Nunen; Roel Vermeulen; Ming-Yi Tsai; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Alex Ineichen; Mark Davey; Medea Imboden; Regina Ducret-Stich; Alessio Naccarati; Daniela Raffaele; Andrea Ranzi; Cristiana Ivaldi; Claudia Galassi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Ariadna Curto; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Marta Cirach; Leda Chatzi; Mariza Kampouri; Jelle Vlaanderen; Kees Meliefste; Daan Buijtenhuijs; Bert Brunekreef; David Morley; Paolo Vineis; John Gulliver; Gerard Hoek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  Energy, Transportation, Air Quality, Climate Change, Health Nexus: Sustainable Energy is Good for Our Health.

Authors:  Larry E Erickson; Merrisa Jennings
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.