| Literature DB >> 24086713 |
Valentina Rossetti1, Thomas W Ammann, Thomas Thurnheer, Homayoun C Bagheri, Georgios N Belibasakis.
Abstract
Filamentous multicellular bacteria are among the most ancient multicellular organisms. They inhabit a great variety of environments and are present in the human body, including the oral cavity. Beside the selective advantages related to the larger size achieved through filamentation, the development of multicellular bacteria can be also driven by simple ecological factors such as birth and death rates at the cellular level. In order to extend earlier results obtained in aquatic species, we investigate the filamentation process of four different strains of oral streptococci, namely S. mutans, S. salivarius, S. oralis and S. anginosus. The results indicate differences in the capacities of different streptococcus species to form filaments, manifested in terms of length and the time-scale of filament elongation. The filamentation pattern of these oral streptococci resembles that of aquatic bacteria, whereby filaments reach a peak length during exponential growth and become short when the population reaches a steady state. Hence, this study validates that multicellularity can be an emergent property of filamentous bacteria of different ecological niches, and that phenotypic differences in filamentation can occur within species of the same genus, in this case oral streptococci. Moreover, given the role that specific oral streptococci can play in the etiology of oral diseases, these results can possibly open new perspectives in the study of the virulence properties of these species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24086713 PMCID: PMC3785443 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Maximum and average length measured in number of cells.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | Nr. Of measures | Min-Max length (cells) | Average length (cells) | Time (h) | Nr. Of measures | Min-Max length (cells) | Average length (cells) | |||
| 0.0 | 106 | 0.6 | 11.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 78 | 0.6 | 9.4 | 3.1 | |
| 1.0 | 95 | 0.8 | 10.8 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 103 | 0.6 | 19.3 | 4.2 | |
| 1.6 | 80 | 1.0 | 14.5 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 217 | 0.1 | 28.6 | 6.0 | |
|
| 125 | 0.7 |
|
|
| 145 | 1.1 | 30.2 |
| |
| 3.0 | 93 | 0.7 | 12.6 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 135 | 1.2 | 46.8 | 7.0 | |
| 4.0 | 108 | 0.5 | 13.3 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 138 | 1.0 | 36.7 | 8.3 | |
| 5.0 | 144 | 1.0 | 12.2 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 192 | 1.0 | 28.7 | 6.0 | |
| 6.0 | 77 | 0.7 | 9.2 | 3.0 | 5.9 | 112 | 0.9 | 45.4 | 8.3 | |
| 6.3 | 149 | 0.8 | 10.7 | 2.1 | 6.7 | 147 | 1.1 | 40.6 | 7.8 | |
| 6.8 | 155 | 0.6 | 7.7 | 2.3 | 7.4 | 126 | 1.1 | 23.7 | 6.7 | |
| 7.3 | 125 | 0.7 | 7.8 | 1.9 |
| 197 | 0.8 |
| 8.4 | |
| 7.8 | 132 | 0.7 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 9.2 | 112 | 1.1 | 25.2 | 6.1 | |
| 8.3 | 206 | 0.4 | 8.6 | 1.9 | 26.2 | 184 | 0.8 | 19.4 | 4.4 | |
| 23.6 | 210 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 1.8 | ||||||
| 27.6 | 136 | 0.6 | 7.0 | 1.8 | ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
| Time (h) | Nr. of measures | Min-Max length (cells) | Average length (cells) | Time (h) | Nr. of measures | Min-Max length (cells) | Average length (cells) | |||
| 0.0 | 101 | 1.4 | 16.8 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 102 | 1.0 | 16.3 | 3.7 | |
| 0.9 | 209 | 0.9 | 11.7 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 123 | 0.8 | 12.3 | 3.6 | |
|
| 150 | 1.1 | 14.3 |
|
| 153 | 0.7 | 9.9 |
| |
| 2.1 | 193 | 0.7 | 14.5 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 216 | 0.6 | 11.9 | 3.6 | |
| 2.7 | 193 | 0.5 | 14.9 | 4.3 | 2.7 | 147 | 0.4 | 9.7 | 2.2 | |
| 3.1 | 187 | 0.7 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 163 | 0.2 | 9.6 | 2.1 | |
|
| 125 | 0.7 |
| 3.5 | 3.7 | 107 | 0.8 | 10.7 | 2.8 | |
| 5.2 | 177 | 0.8 | 13.1 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 198 | 0.7 | 17.4 | 2.5 | |
|
| 182 | 0.9 | 14.3 |
| 5.5 | 132 | 1.0 | 10.1 | 2.5 | |
| 10.0 | 102 | 0.7 | 10.5 | 3.7 | 7.8 | 150 | 0.8 | 6.3 | 2.4 | |
| 12.2 | 205 | 0.4 | 10.4 | 2.8 | 8.9 | 189 | 1.0 | 6.9 | 2.5 | |
| 73.0 | 172 | 0.4 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 89 | 0.7 | 5.4 | 2.5 | |
| 12.2 | 287 | 1.1 | 17.2 | 3.2 | ||||||
|
| 224 | 0.5 |
| 3.1 | ||||||
Results are derived from one representative experiment.
Results of the statistical procedures for the comparison of strains at different time points, derived from one experiment: multiple comparison with Tukey’s honestly significant difference criterion (columns 1-6) and Kruskal-Wallis method (column 7).
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair of species tested | Significant difference | Estimated difference in rank | 95% confidence interval of the difference in rank | Kruskal-Wallis | ||
|
|
| no | 0.65 | -56.22 | 57.52 | p=0.3>0.05 |
|
|
| no | 1.20 | -53.91 | 56.30 | |
|
|
| no | 35.70 | -25.13 | 96.53 | |
|
|
| no | 0.55 | -45.23 | 46.32 | |
|
|
| no | 35.05 | -17.47 | 87.58 | |
|
|
| no | 34.50 | -16.11 | 85.11 | |
|
| ||||||
| Pair of species tested | Significant difference | Estimated difference in rank | 95% confidence interval of the difference in rank | Kruskal-Wallis | ||
|
|
|
| -186.30 | -247.81 | -124.80 | p=0<0.05 |
|
|
| no | 36.54 | -21.31 | 94.40 | |
|
|
| no | 56.58 | -0.06 | 113.21 | |
|
|
|
| 222.85 | 167.47 | 278.23 | |
|
|
|
| 242.88 | 188.78 | 296.98 | |
|
|
| no | 20.03 | -29.88 | 69.95 | |
|
| ||||||
| Pair of species tested | Significant difference | Estimated difference in rank | 95% confidence interval of the difference in rank | Kruskal-Wallis | ||
|
|
|
| -201.33 | -257.21 | -145.45 | p=0<0.05 |
|
|
| no | -30.03 | -82.04 | 21.97 | |
|
|
|
| 112.87 | 59.23 | 166.52 | |
|
|
|
| 171.30 | 118.66 | 223.94 | |
|
|
|
| 314.20 | 259.94 | 368.47 | |
|
|
|
| 142.91 | 92.64 | 193.17 | |
|
| ||||||
| Pair of species tested | Significant difference | Estimated difference in rank | 95% confidence interval of the difference in rank | Kruskal-Wallis | ||
|
|
|
| -234.22 | -288.80 | -179.65 | p=0<0.05 |
|
|
|
| -188.82 | -238.55 | -139.09 | |
|
|
|
| -42.28 | -94.39 | 9.84 | |
|
|
|
| 45.41 | -7.32 | 98.13 | |
|
|
|
| 191.95 | 136.97 | 246.93 | |
|
|
|
| 146.54 | 96.37 | 196.72 | |
|
| ||||||
| Pair of species tested | Significant difference | Estimated difference in rank | 95% confidence interval of the difference in rank | Kruskal-Wallis | ||
|
|
|
| -283.69 | -342.89 | -224.49 | p=0<0.05 |
|
|
| no | -22.45 | -82.73 | 37.84 | |
|
|
|
| -193.30 | -249.61 | -136.99 | |
|
|
|
| 261.24 | 199.07 | 323.42 | |
|
|
|
| 90.39 | 32.06 | 148.72 | |
|
|
|
| -170.86 | -230.29 | -111.42 | |
Figure 1Mean filament length and growth curves at successive time points.
The plots show the mean filament length (black line) and optical density (OD550) measurements (grey line) of S. mutans, S. salivarius, S. anginosus and S. oralis at successive time points during growth. Data are based on the analysis of six pictures coming from two distinct wells per time point, from one representative experiment. Length was calculated in terms of number of cells of the filaments. Lower and upper edges of the error bars indicate the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles respectively. Pie charts on top of each plot indicate the distribution of short, medium and long filaments at four distinct growth phases. These categories correspond to 1-2, 3-8 and more than 8 cells in the case of S. mutans, S. anginosus and S. oralis. In the case of S. salivarius, they correspond to 1-10, 11-30 and more than 30 cells. The y-axis scale of S. salivarius differs from the others for a better visualization of the plot.
Figure 2Filaments of S. salivarius.
The four pictures have been taken from S. salivarius cultures after 1, 4, 5 and 26 hours after inoculum respectively. While after 4-5 hours filaments lengths are near their maximum, after 26 hours they return to shortened lengths similar to those of the initial phase.