Literature DB >> 24085327

All-cause and disease-related health care costs associated with recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Patrick Lefebvre1, François Laliberté, Edith A Nutescu, Mei Sheng Duh, Joyce LaMori, Brahim K Bookhart, William H Olson, Katherine Dea, Yvonnick Hossou, Jeff Schein, Scott Kaatz.   

Abstract

It was the objective of this study to quantify the risk of complications and the incremental health care costs associated with recurrent VTE events. Health care insurance claims from the Ingenix IMPACT database from 01/2004-09/2008 were analysed. Subjects aged ≥18 years on the date of first recurrent VTE diagnosis with ≥12 months of baseline observation prior to the index recurrent VTE were matched 1:1 with no-recurrent VTE patients based on propensity scores. The risk of developing post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and other disease-related diagnoses (thrombocytopenia, superficial venous thrombosis, venous ulcer, pulmonary hypertension, stasis dermatitis, and venous insufficiency) was compared between the recurrent and no-recurrent VTE groups for up to one year. All-cause and disease-related costs per patient per year (PPPY) were calculated. The recurrent VTE and no-recurrent VTE cohorts (8,001 subjects in each group) were matched with respect to age, gender, and comorbidities. The risk ratios (RRs) indicated that the risk of developing post-event complications was significantly higher for the recurrent VTE group compared to the no-recurrent VTE group (RR [95% CI]: PTS: 2.7 [2.4 - 2.9], p-value <0.01). Patients with recurrent VTE had significantly higher average PPPY all-cause costs compared to no-recurrent VTE patients ($86,744 versus $37,525, cost difference: $49,219 [€33,617]; 95% CI= 46,253-51,989). Corresponding disease-related health care costs PPPY were also significantly higher for the recurrent VTE group ($11,120 vs $1,262, cost difference: $9,858 [€6,733]; 95% CI= $9,081-$10,476). In conclusion, in this large matched-cohort study, recurrent VTE patients had significantly higher risk of complications and health care costs compared to no-recurrent VTE patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Recurrent venous thromboembolism; complications; costs; risks

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085327     DOI: 10.1160/TH13-05-0425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  4 in total

Review 1.  The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Richard E Nelson; Kwame A Nyarko; Lisa C Richardson; Gary E Raskob
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  Evaluation of medical costs avoided when new oral anticoagulants are used for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism based on clinical trial results.

Authors:  Alpesh Amin; Yonghua Jing; Jeffrey Trocio; Jay Lin; Melissa Lingohr-Smith; John Graham
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part I. The Consensus for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Cheng-Han Lee; Pei-Ying Pai; Pao-Yen Lin; Kou-Gi Shyu; Wei-Tien Chang; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Chien-Lung Huang; Chung-Yi Lee; Yen-Hung Lin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Hsueh-Wei Yen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Hung-I Yeh; Chern-En Chiang; Shing-Jong Lin; San-Jou Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 4.  New Oral Anticoagulants Open New Horizons for Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Kaidireyahan Wumaier; Wenqian Li; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.319

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.