Literature DB >> 24085229

Sight Word and Phonics Training in Children With Dyslexia.

Genevieve McArthur1, Anne Castles2, Saskia Kohnen2, Linda Larsen2, Kristy Jones2, Thushara Anandakumar2, Erin Banales2.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to (a) compare sight word training and phonics training in children with dyslexia, and (b) determine if different orders of sight word and phonics training have different effects on the reading skills of children with dyslexia. One group of children (n = 36) did 8 weeks of phonics training (reading via grapheme-phoneme correspondence rules) and then 8 weeks of sight word training (reading irregular words as a whole), one group did the reverse (n = 36), and one group did phonics and sight word training simultaneously for two 8-week periods (n = 32). We measured the effects of phonics and sight word training on sight word reading (trained irregular word reading accuracy, untrained irregular word reading accuracy), phonics reading (nonword reading accuracy, nonword reading fluency), and general reading (word reading fluency, reading comprehension). Sight word training led to significant gains in sight word reading measures that were larger than gains made from phonics training, phonics training led to statistically significant gains in a phonics reading measure that were larger than gains made from sight word training, and both types of training led to significant gains in general reading that were similar in size. Training phonics before sight words had a slight advantage over the reverse order. We discuss the clinical implications of these findings for improving the treatment and assessment of children with dyslexia. © Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyslexia; phonics; reading; sight word training; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085229     DOI: 10.1177/0022219413504996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Learn Disabil        ISSN: 0022-2194


  5 in total

1.  The effect of an integrated reading and anxiety intervention for poor readers with anxiety.

Authors:  Deanna Francis; Jennifer L Hudson; Saskia Kohnen; Lynn Mobach; Genevieve M McArthur
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Replicability of sight word training and phonics training in poor readers: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  G McArthur; S Kohnen; K Jones; P Eve; E Banales; L Larsen; A Castles
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers.

Authors:  Genevieve McArthur; Yumi Sheehan; Nicholas A Badcock; Deanna A Francis; Hua-Chen Wang; Saskia Kohnen; Erin Banales; Thushara Anandakumar; Eva Marinus; Anne Castles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-14

4.  An evaluation of systematized phonics on reading proficiency in Swedish second grade poor readers: Effects on pseudoword and sight word reading skills.

Authors:  Maria Levlin; Cecilia Nakeva von Mentzer
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2020-09-28

5.  How many deficits in the same dyslexic brains? A behavioural and fMRI assessment of comorbidity in adult dyslexics.

Authors:  Laura Danelli; Manuela Berlingeri; Gabriella Bottini; Nunzio A Borghese; Mirko Lucchese; Maurizio Sberna; Cathy J Price; Eraldo Paulesu
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.027

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.