Literature DB >> 24084169

Specificity in suppression of SOS expression by recA4162 and uvrD303.

Shawn C Massoni1, Steven J Sandler.   

Abstract

Detection and repair of DNA damage is essential in all organisms and depends on the ability of proteins recognizing and processing specific DNA substrates. In E. coli, the RecA protein forms a filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by DNA damage and induces the SOS response. Previous work has shown that one type of recA mutation (e.g., recA4162 (I298V)) and one type of uvrD mutation (e.g., uvrD303 (D403A, D404A)) can differentially decrease SOS expression depending on the type of inducing treatments (UV damage versus RecA mutants that constitutively express SOS). Here it is tested using other SOS inducing conditions if there is a general feature of ssDNA generated during these treatments that allows recA4162 and uvrD303 to decrease SOS expression. The SOS inducing conditions tested include growing cells containing temperature-sensitive DNA replication mutations (dnaE486, dnaG2903, dnaN159, dnaZ2016 (at 37°C)), a del(polA)501 mutation and induction of Double-Strand Breaks (DSBs). uvrD303 could decrease SOS expression under all conditions, while recA4162 could decrease SOS expression under all conditions except in the polA strain or when DSBs occur. It is hypothesized that recA4162 suppresses SOS expression best when the ssDNA occurs at a gap and that uvrD303 is able to decrease SOS expression when the ssDNA is either at a gap or when it is generated at a DSB (but does so better at a gap).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; DNA replication; Homologous recombination; SOS response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24084169      PMCID: PMC3845027          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  91 in total

1.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M M Cox; M F Goodman; K N Kreuzer; D J Sherratt; S J Sandler; K J Marians
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  dnaC mutations suppress defects in DNA replication- and recombination-associated functions in priB and priC double mutants in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  S J Sandler; K J Marians; K H Zavitz; J Coutu; M A Parent; A J Clark
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  RecA4142 causes SOS constitutive expression by loading onto reversed replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Jarukit Edward Long; Shawn C Massoni; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  The SOS response promotes qnrB quinolone-resistance determinant expression.

Authors:  Sandra Da Re; Fabien Garnier; Emilie Guérin; Susana Campoy; François Denis; Marie-Cécile Ploy
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  SOS regulatory elements are essential for UPEC pathogenesis.

Authors:  Birong Li; Peter Smith; Dennis J Horvath; Floyd E Romesberg; Sheryl S Justice
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.700

6.  Ciprofloxacin causes persister formation by inducing the TisB toxin in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tobias Dörr; Marin Vulić; Kim Lewis
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  The SOS response controls integron recombination.

Authors:  Emilie Guerin; Guillaume Cambray; Neus Sanchez-Alberola; Susana Campoy; Ivan Erill; Sandra Da Re; Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn; Jordi Barbé; Marie-Cécile Ploy; Didier Mazel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Suppression of constitutive SOS expression by recA4162 (I298V) and recA4164 (L126V) requires UvrD and RecX in Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  Jarukit E Long; Nicholas Renzette; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Conjugative DNA transfer induces the bacterial SOS response and promotes antibiotic resistance development through integron activation.

Authors:  Zeynep Baharoglu; David Bikard; Didier Mazel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tobias Dörr; Kim Lewis; Marin Vulić
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  5 in total

1.  Function of a strand-separation pin element in the PriA DNA replication restart helicase.

Authors:  Tricia A Windgassen; Maxime Leroux; Steven J Sandler; James L Keck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Structure-specific DNA replication-fork recognition directs helicase and replication restart activities of the PriA helicase.

Authors:  Tricia A Windgassen; Maxime Leroux; Kenneth A Satyshur; Steven J Sandler; James L Keck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Repair of transposable phage Mu DNA insertions begins only when the E. coli replisome collides with the transpososome.

Authors:  Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  The fatty acid signaling molecule cis-2-decenoic acid increases metabolic activity and reverts persister cells to an antimicrobial-susceptible state.

Authors:  Cláudia N H Marques; Aleksey Morozov; Penny Planzos; Hector M Zelaya
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Directed Evolution of RecA Variants with Enhanced Capacity for Conjugational Recombination.

Authors:  Taejin Kim; Sindhu Chitteni-Pattu; Benjamin L Cox; Elizabeth A Wood; Steven J Sandler; Michael M Cox
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.917

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.