| Literature DB >> 24084118 |
Harith Ahmad1, Kavintheran Thambiratnam, Ahmad Z Zulkifli, Anthony Lawrence, Ali A Jasim, Wijenthiran Kunasekaran, Sabri Musa, Nareshwaran Gnanasegaran, Punitha Vasanthan, Pukana Jayaraman, Noor H A Kasim, Vijayendran Govindasamy, Mohammad S Shahrir, Sulaiman W Harun.
Abstract
An efficient and low cost optical method for directly measuring the concentration of homogenous biological solutes is proposed and demonstrated. The proposed system operates by Fresnel reflection, with a flat-cleaved single-mode fiber serving as the sensor probe. A laser provides a 12.9 dBm sensor signal at 1,550 nm, while a computer-controlled optical power meter measures the power of the signal returned by the probe. Three different mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) lines were obtained, sub-cultured and trypsinized daily over 9 days. Counts were measured using a haemocytometer and the conditioned media (CM) was collected daily and stored at -80 °C. MSCs release excretory biomolecules proportional to their growth rate into the CM, which changes the refractive index of the latter. The sensor is capable of detecting changes in the number of stem cells via correlation to the change in the refractive index of the CM, with the measured power loss decreasing approximately 0.4 dB in the CM sample per average 1,000 cells in the MSC subculture. The proposed system is highly cost-effective, simple to deploy, operate, and maintain, is non-destructive, and allows reliable real-time measurement of various stem cell proliferation parameters.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24084118 PMCID: PMC3859063 DOI: 10.3390/s131013276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Averaged cell count, by day, for each cell line. The standard deviation for each count is delineated by the SD columns.
| 1 | 3,333 | 2,886.751 | 33,333 | 5,773.502 | 5,000 | 0.000 |
| 2 | 3,333 | 2,886.751 | 41,667 | 5,773.502 | 23,333 | 2,886.751 |
| 3 | 6,667 | 2,886.751 | 48,333 | 10,408.33 | 16,666 | 2,886.751 |
| 4 | 11,667 | 5,773.502 | 151,667 | 40,414.520 | 138,333 | 18,930.000 |
| 5 | 75,000 | 10,000.000 | 160,000 | 10,000.000 | 148,333 | 34,034.000 |
| 6 | 28,333 | 2,886.751 | 210,000 | 65,000.000 | 176,667 | 32,532.035 |
| 7 | 50,000 | 10,000.000 | 156,667 | 52,041.650 | 208,333 | 28,431.200 |
| 8 | 40,000 | 15,000.000 | 141,667 | 27,537.850 | 128,333 | 20,207.260 |
| 9 | 21,667 | 10,408.000 | 143,333 | 12,583.060 | 241,667 | 32,532.035 |
Figure 1.Morphology and the growth of the different MSCs obtained at different days of the experiment. The captured images provide a visual validation of the cell counts obtained in Table 1.
Figure 2.Experimental setup of the proposed sensor system.
Figure 3.−Log10 (Power Loss) and cumulative cell count against different conditioned media samples for the WJSC.SC3 cell line. The power loss is represented by the line graph, with the corresponding X-axis on the left, while the cell count is represented by the bar chart, with the corresponding X-axis on the right side of the graph.
Figure 4.−Log10 (Power Loss) (dB) and cumulative cell count against different conditioned media samples for the SCD.SC4 cell line. The power loss is represented by the line graph, with the corresponding X-axis on the left, while the cell count is represented by the bar chart, with the corresponding X-axis on the right side of the graph.
Figure 5.−Log10 (Power Loss) (dB) and cumulative cell count against different conditioned media samples for the SCD.SC3 cell line. The power loss is represented by the line graph, with the corresponding X-axis on the left, while the cell count is represented by the bar chart, with the corresponding X-axis on the right side of the graph.
Figure 6.Power loss (dB) against time for selected samples for the WJSC.SC3 cell line (samples taken from Day 1, Day 5 and Day 9).
Figure 7.Power loss (dB) against time for selected samples for the three different cell line (all samples taken from Day 1).