OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pediatric primary care provider (PCP) HIV screening practices, knowledge, and attitudes. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous cross-sectional, internet-based survey of pediatric PCPs from 29 primary care practices. Survey items assessed current HIV screening practices and knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers towards screening. Provider demographics and practice characteristics were analyzed for associations with screening through logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 190 PCPs, there were 101 evaluable responses (response rate: 53.2%). PCPs reported a screening rate for HIV of 39.6% ("most" or "all of the time") during routine adolescent visits compared with violence (60.4%), substance abuse (92.1%), and depression (94.1%) (P < .001). Less than 10% of PCPs correctly answered questions related to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state HIV screening recommendations. Of 20 potential HIV screening barriers assessed, mean number of reported barriers was 4.8 (SD ± 2.9); with most concerns related to confidentiality, time for counseling, and follow-up. In a multivariable model, the only factor significantly associated with HIV screening "most" or "all of the time" during routine adolescent visits was urban practice site (aOR 9.8, 95% CI 2.9, 32.9). Provider type, sex, years since training, HIV screening guideline knowledge, and endorsing ≤5 barriers were not associated with HIV screening. CONCLUSIONS: Although providers practicing in urban areas were more likely to report screening adolescents for HIV than those in suburban areas, overall self-reported screening rates were low, and several barriers were identified commonly. Future interventions should target increasing providers' knowledge and addressing concerns about confidentiality, requirements and counseling time, and follow-up of results.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pediatric primary care provider (PCP) HIV screening practices, knowledge, and attitudes. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous cross-sectional, internet-based survey of pediatric PCPs from 29 primary care practices. Survey items assessed current HIV screening practices and knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers towards screening. Provider demographics and practice characteristics were analyzed for associations with screening through logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 190 PCPs, there were 101 evaluable responses (response rate: 53.2%). PCPs reported a screening rate for HIV of 39.6% ("most" or "all of the time") during routine adolescent visits compared with violence (60.4%), substance abuse (92.1%), and depression (94.1%) (P < .001). Less than 10% of PCPs correctly answered questions related to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state HIV screening recommendations. Of 20 potential HIV screening barriers assessed, mean number of reported barriers was 4.8 (SD ± 2.9); with most concerns related to confidentiality, time for counseling, and follow-up. In a multivariable model, the only factor significantly associated with HIV screening "most" or "all of the time" during routine adolescent visits was urban practice site (aOR 9.8, 95% CI 2.9, 32.9). Provider type, sex, years since training, HIV screening guideline knowledge, and endorsing ≤5 barriers were not associated with HIV screening. CONCLUSIONS: Although providers practicing in urban areas were more likely to report screening adolescents for HIV than those in suburban areas, overall self-reported screening rates were low, and several barriers were identified commonly. Future interventions should target increasing providers' knowledge and addressing concerns about confidentiality, requirements and counseling time, and follow-up of results.
Authors: Lori Leonard; Kathryn Berndtson; Pamela Matson; Morgan Philbin; Renata Arrington-Sanders; Jonathan M Ellen Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2010-12
Authors: Alexandra B Balaji; Danice K Eaton; Andrew C Voetsch; Ryan E Wiegand; Kim S Miller; Sonal R Doshi Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2012-01-02
Authors: P Todd Korthuis; Gail V Berkenblit; Lynn E Sullivan; Joseph Cofrancesco; Robert L Cook; Michael Bass; Philip G Bashook; Marcia Edison; Steve M Asch; James M Sosman Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2011-06
Authors: Michael G Bass; P Todd Korthuis; Joseph Cofrancesco; Gail V Berkenblit; Lynn E Sullivan; Steve M Asch; Philip G Bashook; Marcia Edison; James M Sosman; Robert L Cook Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Charu L Jain; Christina M Wyatt; Ryan Burke; Kent Sepkowitz; Elizabeth M Begier Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Timothy D Minniear; Barry Gilmore; Sandra R Arnold; Patricia M Flynn; Katherine M Knapp; Aditya H Gaur Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-09-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ikechukwu U Ogbuanu; Myriam E Torres; Lynda Kettinger; Helmut Albrecht; Wayne A Duffus Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kirk D Henny; Christopher C Duke; Angelica Geter; Zaneta Gaul; Chantell Frazier; Jennifer Peterson; Kate Buchacz; Madeline Y Sutton Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-11
Authors: Matthew E Levy; Leo Wilton; Gregory Phillips; Sara Nelson Glick; Irene Kuo; Russell A Brewer; Ayana Elliott; Christopher Watson; Manya Magnus Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-05
Authors: Bridgette M Brawner; Kamila A Alexander; Ehriel F Fannin; Jillian L Baker; Zupenda M Davis Journal: Public Health Nurs Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 1.462
Authors: David Córdova; Frania Mendoza Lua; Lauretta Ovadje; Kathryn Fessler; José A Bauermeister; Christopher P Salas-Wright; Michael G Vaughn; Youth Leadership Council Journal: Health Commun Date: 2017-07-07
Authors: Kirk D Henny; Christopher C Duke; Kate Buchacz; John T Brooks; Taraz Samandari; Madeline Y Sutton Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.018