Literature DB >> 24083911

Patient factors associated with undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss.

Caroline M Apovian1, Karen W Huskey, Sarah Chiodi, Donald T Hess, Benjamin E Schneider, George L Blackburn, Daniel B Jones, Christina C Wee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding are 2 commonly performed bariatric procedures in the US with different profiles for risk and effectiveness. Little is known about factors that might lead patients to proceed with one procedure over the other. STUDY
DESIGN: We recruited and interviewed patients seeking bariatric surgery from 2 academic centers in Boston (response rate 70%). We conducted multivariable analyses to identify patient perceptions and clinical and behavioral characteristics that correlated with undergoing gastric banding (n = 239) vs gastric bypass (n = 297).
RESULTS: After adjustment for socio-demographic and clinical factors, we found that older patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05) and those with higher quality of life scores and higher levels of uncontrolled eating were more likely to undergo gastric banding as opposed to gastric bypass. In contrast, patients with type 2 diabetes (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.77), those who desired greater weight loss, and those who were willing to assume higher mortality risk to achieve their ideal weight were less likely to proceed with gastric banding. After initial adjustment, male sex and lower body mass index were associated with a likelihood of undergoing gastric banding; however, these factors were no longer significant after adjustment for other significant correlates such as patients' perceived ideal weight, predilection to assume risk to lose weight, and eating behavior.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' diabetes status, quality of life, eating behavior, ideal weight loss, and willingness to assume mortality risk to lose weight were associated with whether patients proceeded with gastric banding as opposed to gastric bypass. Other clinical factors were less important.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; IWQOL-lite; Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-lite Questionnaire; SOS-TFEQ-18; Swedish Obese Subjects Three Factor Eating Questionnaire; body mass index

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24083911      PMCID: PMC3919465          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  22 in total

1.  The measurement of dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger: an examination of the factor structure of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ).

Authors:  M J Bond; A J McDowell; J Y Wilkinson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-06

2.  Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The effect of eating behavior on weight loss and maintenance during a lifestyle intervention.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Keränen; Markku J Savolainen; Annakaisa H Reponen; Mona-Lisa Kujari; Sari M Lindeman; Risto S Bloigu; Jaana H Laitinen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  THE STANDARD OF LIVING IN THE UNITED STATES.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1890-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Bariatric surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Kristoffel R Dumon; Kenric M Murayama
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study.

Authors:  J Karlsson; L O Persson; L Sjöström; M Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-12

7.  Effect of weight loss intervention on the association between eating behaviour measured by TFEQ-18 and dietary intake in adults.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Keränen; Katrin Strengell; Markku J Savolainen; Jaana H Laitinen
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Psychological correlates of obese patients seeking surgical or residential behavioral weight loss treatment.

Authors:  Anna L Stout; Katherine L Applegate; Kelli E Friedman; John P Grant; Gerard J Musante
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Obese African-American women's perspectives on weight loss and bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Cheryl Sterling Lynch; Judy C Chang; Angela F Ford; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Executive summary of the clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-09-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient preferences and bariatric surgery procedure selection; the need for shared decision-making.

Authors:  Andrew L Weinstein; Bryan J Marascalchi; Matthew A Spiegel; John K Saunders; Angela Fagerlin; Manish Parikh
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Quality of Life Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleeya Hachem; Leah Brennan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.