Literature DB >> 24082810

Health care professionals' attitudes about pregnancy termination for different fetal anomalies.

Annie Janvier1, Elise Couture, Marianne Deschenes, Sophie Nadeau, Keith Barrington, John Lantos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care professionals (HCPs) may be involved in counselling women after an antenatal diagnosis of various fetal anomalies. Many pregnant women consider termination of pregnancy (TOP) after antenatal diagnosis of various fetal anomalies. Little is known, however, about the attitudes of HCPs regarding TOP for specific antenatal diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the attitudes and opinions of HCPs in maternal and child health regarding TOP for fetal anomalies of varying severity.
METHODS: AN ANONYMOUS QUESTIONNAIRE WAS DISTRIBUTED TO FOUR GROUPS OF HCPS: obstetric residents; paediatric residents; delivery room nurses; and neonatal intensive care nurses. Respondents were asked about TOP if they or their spouse were to receive an antenatal diagnosis for five prenatally diagnosed conditions: trisomy 21; trisomy 18; cleft lip and palate; Turner syndrome; and hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty HCPs answered the questionnaire (90% response rate). Ten per cent of respondents would not consider TOP under any of the circumstances described. Among those who would consider TOP, they were most likely to do so for trisomy 18 and least likely for cleft lip and palate, and fairly evenly divided among the remaining three conditions (hypoplastic left heart syndrome [65%], trisomy 21 [56%] and Turner syndrome [37%]). Paediatric residents were less likely to choose TOP than other groups and obstetrics residents were most likely.
CONCLUSIONS: Attitudes of HCPs toward TOP vary according to prenatally identified condition and professional group. More rigorous analysis should be performed regarding the process of counselling and the impact of HCPs beliefs on parental decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics; Health care providers’ opinions; Pregnancy termination; Prenatal counselling; Prenatal diagnosis; Trisomy 18; Trisomy 21; Turner syndrome

Year:  2012        PMID: 24082810      PMCID: PMC3474393          DOI: 10.1093/pch/17.8.e86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1205-7088            Impact factor:   2.253


  6 in total

1.  He was my son, not a dying baby.

Authors:  Pauline Thiele
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The health-care experiences of families given the prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 18.

Authors:  L V Walker; V J Miller; V K Dalton
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  "Choosing the road less traveled".

Authors:  Barbara Farlow
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care       Date:  2011-04

4.  [Decision-making in termination of pregnancy: a French perspective].

Authors:  G Gorincour; S Tassy; A Payot; N Philip; P Malzac; J-R Harlé; J-F Mattei; P Le Coz
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2011-03-23

5.  A survey of providers' knowledge, opinions, and practices regarding induced abortion in Jamaica.

Authors:  Horace Fletcher; Georgiana Gordon-Strachan; Shelly McFarlane; Pansy Hamilton; Joseph Frederick
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  Parental decisions following the prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Hanan A Hamamy; Sophie Dahoun
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 2.435

  6 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  New Challenges with Treatment Advances in Newborn Infants with Genetic Disorders and Severe Congenital Malformations.

Authors:  Rahel Schuler; Ivonne Bedei; Frank Oehmke; Klaus-Peter Zimmer; Harald Ehrhardt
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.